Go Back   Access World Forums > Non-Access Issues > Debates

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-26-2013, 07:47 AM   #1
Jon
Access World Site Owner
 
Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: East Sussex, UK
Posts: 789
Thanks: 13
Thanked 1,875 Times in 62 Posts
Jon has a brilliant future Jon has a brilliant future Jon has a brilliant future Jon has a brilliant future Jon has a brilliant future Jon has a brilliant future Jon has a brilliant future Jon has a brilliant future Jon has a brilliant future Jon has a brilliant future Jon has a brilliant future
Should there be the death penalty?

Very contentious. But that is what this area is for.

__________________
Regards,

Jon
Jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2013, 11:47 AM   #2
Vassago
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 4,335
Thanks: 81
Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
Vassago has a spectacular aura about Vassago has a spectacular aura about Vassago has a spectacular aura about
Re: Should there be the death penalty?

Definitely. But only for the most heinous of crimes that are repeat offenders. There have been far too many innocent people put to death that are pardoned post-martem because of new evidence.
__________________
Vassago
Vassago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2013, 08:24 PM   #3
The_Doc_Man
Happy Retired Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Suburban New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 14,238
Thanks: 86
Thanked 1,623 Times in 1,506 Posts
The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold
Re: Should there be the death penalty?

I would say this:

Do away with an automatic death penalty. But for folks who have committed the most heinous of crimes such that they get hundreds of years of prison sentences to run consecutively, give them the option to voluntarily end it all.

Let the volunteers have a nice dinner, a visit with a loved one, and maybe a generally pleasant day, to be followed by a strong sleeping pill. Then, while they are asleep, give them something permanent. Reserve this only for criminals who will NEVER see the light of day or smell freedom because of their crimes. And if they want to spend the rest of their lives in small, cramped cages, that's OK too.

__________________
I'm a certified grandpa (3 times now) and proud of it.
Retired over one year and survived being home all day with the wife. She must really love me.
If I have helped you, please either click the thanks or click the scales.
The_Doc_Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2013, 02:02 AM   #4
fortion
Newly Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
fortion is on a distinguished road
Re: Should there be the death penalty?

yes....they have to be used as a detterent for the most heinous crimes and such people can only be made an example of by death....
fortion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 03:12 AM   #5
Salinger
Newly Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 15
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Salinger is on a distinguished road
Re: Should there be the death penalty?

Interesting view there, The Doc Man, it being voluntary and for repeat offenders, otherwise I have no trust in the legal system that someone wrongly accused wont end up being killed unnecessarily.
And I'm not sure what it's saying that one kind of killing is allowed to punish another kind.
But the voluntary idea could be an option. Open to abuse though maybe?
Salinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 03:54 AM   #6
scott-atkinson
I'm with the Witch.......
 
scott-atkinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Midlands, (Formally Essex Barrow Boy....)
Posts: 1,584
Thanks: 25
Thanked 29 Times in 26 Posts
scott-atkinson will become famous soon enough
Re: Should there be the death penalty?

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Doc_Man View Post
I would say this:

Do away with an automatic death penalty. But for folks who have committed the most heinous of crimes such that they get hundreds of years of prison sentences to run consecutively, give them the option to voluntarily end it all.

Let the volunteers have a nice dinner, a visit with a loved one, and maybe a generally pleasant day, to be followed by a strong sleeping pill. Then, while they are asleep, give them something permanent. Reserve this only for criminals who will NEVER see the light of day or smell freedom because of their crimes. And if they want to spend the rest of their lives in small, cramped cages, that's OK too.
My only problem with this is the nicety of it all, people who would qualify for this would almost certianly have not given their victims the same level of respect, so why should they be treated to a nice sedate dignified death...
__________________
As you slide down the banister of life, may the splinters never point the wrong way.
scott-atkinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 04:04 AM   #7
Salinger
Newly Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 15
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Salinger is on a distinguished road
Re: Should there be the death penalty?

Because in that way we show that we are different to them.

Salinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 04:25 AM   #8
scott-atkinson
I'm with the Witch.......
 
scott-atkinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Midlands, (Formally Essex Barrow Boy....)
Posts: 1,584
Thanks: 25
Thanked 29 Times in 26 Posts
scott-atkinson will become famous soon enough
Re: Should there be the death penalty?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salinger View Post
Because in that way we show that we are different to them.
We already treat many criminals differently by provideing them with 3 square meals a day, access to cable TV, and recreational activities, may of these are considered luxuries by hard working class people on the bread line...

If you commit a crime, you should be treated like a lower class person, not put on a pedastal and given everything...

Recent cases of criminals winning claims under the Human Rights Act for even more quality of life is ludicrous, if you commit a crime, in my mind you should lose all your Human Rights until such a point that you can demonstrate that you are indeed a Human again.... After all, did these criminals consider the Human Rights of the people they committed a crime against, no of course they did not...
__________________
As you slide down the banister of life, may the splinters never point the wrong way.
scott-atkinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 04:47 AM   #9
nanscombe
Newly Registered User
 
nanscombe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Kent, UK.
Posts: 1,082
Thanks: 0
Thanked 256 Times in 249 Posts
nanscombe will become famous soon enough
Re: Should there be the death penalty?

Perhaps we should only have the death penalty for suicide bombers but perhaps it wouldn't be appropriate for Brazilian electricians.
__________________
Nigel
Ex Tactical Systems developer
nanscombe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 09:41 AM   #10
The_Doc_Man
Happy Retired Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Suburban New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 14,238
Thanks: 86
Thanked 1,623 Times in 1,506 Posts
The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold
Re: Should there be the death penalty?

My idea would have applied to Ariel Castro, the kidnapper with the 1000-year sentence and enough physical evidence to assure that it was nearly impossible to have made a mistake in charging him. He took the short way out.

As to the question of whether we deny justice to the persons who were his victims, I have this question: Did we want justice or was that creeping into the territory of revenge? Society CANNOT put itself into the revenge business. Only people can exact revenge.

Society can, however, perform deterrent acts to put an end to predation. After that, society has the very practical question: Which is cheaper? To keep a schmuck in jail until he rots, or let him take the easy way out without incurring a tremendous number of expensive appeals. But if the perpetrator wants to play the system for appeals, allow it. (We have those appeals now anyway, so what's the difference?)
__________________
I'm a certified grandpa (3 times now) and proud of it.
Retired over one year and survived being home all day with the wife. She must really love me.
If I have helped you, please either click the thanks or click the scales.
The_Doc_Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 11:36 AM   #11
MarkK
Super Moderator
 
MarkK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 7,761
Thanks: 10
Thanked 1,289 Times in 1,227 Posts
MarkK is a name known to all MarkK is a name known to all MarkK is a name known to all MarkK is a name known to all MarkK is a name known to all MarkK is a name known to all
If it is wrong for me to murder someone then I don't see how it's right for the state to do so.

Yes, a society has a right to self-defense, but incarceration is a sufficient remedy. I think a state should use the least amount of violence to protect itself and killing a human being who is already incarcerated--who is already neutralized as a social threat--is gratuitous violence.

Also, if we kill murderers, why don't we chop off the hands of thieves? How is there a moral difference between corporal and capital punishments? One of those we commonly deem barbaric.

Violence is immoral, therefore "justice for all" should be implemented using the least possible degree of violence.
__________________
formerly known as lagbolt | Windows 10 | Access 2010 | Visual Studio 2013 | "Institutions have a vested interest in perpetuating the problems to which they are the solution." - Clay Shirky
MarkK is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MarkK For This Useful Post:
Salinger (09-16-2013)
Old 09-12-2013, 12:32 PM   #12
Vassago
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 4,335
Thanks: 81
Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
Vassago has a spectacular aura about Vassago has a spectacular aura about Vassago has a spectacular aura about
Re: Should there be the death penalty?

We would have far less people in jail and prison if we would stop sending non-violent crimes there for ridiculous amounts of time. That would save plenty of money.
__________________
Vassago
Vassago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2013, 08:44 PM   #13
The_Doc_Man
Happy Retired Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Suburban New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 14,238
Thanks: 86
Thanked 1,623 Times in 1,506 Posts
The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold The_Doc_Man is a splendid one to behold
Re: Should there be the death penalty?

Vassago, I'm with you on that. Let's attempt to get some sanity on non-violent drug possession charges for starters. All "possession with intent to use" should be a low-level misdemeanor with minimal jail time and maybe a fine. Maybe just a fine. Certainly ineligible for contributing to any form of "three strikes you're out" law.

Lagbolt, I actually agree with you but make a distinction between your position and my proposed position. The person to be executed in my suggested scenario has to volunteer for it or they just rot in jail. Society, which has chosen to limit that person's freedom already, has made it impossible for him/her to take an easy exit. So my suggestion is to let people have their easy exit anyway.

Granted, it's a fine line, but we have faced the issue of suicide before in society. We have to draw the line on assisted suicide when someone else has to actually do the deed, though we DO allow someone else to set up the method if the person in question is still able to push a button to trigger the final moment.

Jack Kevorian crossed that line and got taken down for it, but the state of Oregon, USA, very clearly said that suicide when faced with a terminal situation cannot be considered as a totally irrational act. I certainly don't want to push anyone into ending it all.
__________________
I'm a certified grandpa (3 times now) and proud of it.
Retired over one year and survived being home all day with the wife. She must really love me.
If I have helped you, please either click the thanks or click the scales.
The_Doc_Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2013, 06:57 AM   #14
pr2-eugin
Super Moderator
 
pr2-eugin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Bournemouth, UK
Posts: 8,498
Thanks: 68
Thanked 2,066 Times in 2,014 Posts
pr2-eugin has a spectacular aura about pr2-eugin has a spectacular aura about pr2-eugin has a spectacular aura about
Re: Should there be the death penalty?

For a SPAMMER like you.. I think it should be
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dafjvid View Post
allowed to punish
__________________
Regards,
Paul Eugin

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
!
!
Windows 7 Professional, MS Access 2010
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the above post has helped you, please click the scales
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or click the 'Thumbs up'. Cheers.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



pr2-eugin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2013, 07:14 PM   #15
MarkK
Super Moderator
 
MarkK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 7,761
Thanks: 10
Thanked 1,289 Times in 1,227 Posts
MarkK is a name known to all MarkK is a name known to all MarkK is a name known to all MarkK is a name known to all MarkK is a name known to all MarkK is a name known to all
"possession with intent to use"

I think "possession with intent to use" should not be the business of the state. Period. The state does not prosecute adultery nor should it. The state should also not prosecute other altered states one might wish to indulge in.

Like, nobody wants to be addicted to cocaine. Drug abuse, like adultery, provides it's own self-embedded punishments, and I don't get why the state feels a need to get involved. Like, how to kick people when they are down: criminalize them for drug offenses. Addicts already feel enough shame.

There is, and always will be, a market for drugs. We can play at fighting it, making it illegal, calling it wrong, being morally superior, but whatever we do, there is, and always will be, a market for drugs. Let's accept it, understand it, tax it, and start helping its victims.

__________________
formerly known as lagbolt | Windows 10 | Access 2010 | Visual Studio 2013 | "Institutions have a vested interest in perpetuating the problems to which they are the solution." - Clay Shirky
MarkK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Performance penalty of supporting end-user debugging/verbose mode? Banana General 3 12-11-2007 03:59 AM
Death Penalty Saves 18 lives per year? Jakboi Politics & Current Events 16 07-08-2007 04:19 AM
Done to Death olorin Reports 2 02-11-2007 10:51 PM
Death Of A President Mile-O Politics & Current Events 95 10-19-2006 11:47 PM
Death to clippit? o1110010 General 2 04-23-2004 05:07 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Microsoft Access Help
General
Tables
Queries
Forms
Reports
Macros
Modules & VBA
Theory & Practice
Access FAQs
Code Repository
Sample Databases
Video Tutorials

Featured Forum post


Sponsored Links


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) copyright 2017 Access World