Steve R.
Retired
- Local time
- Today, 05:36
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2006
- Messages
- 5,223
The debate on the US debt ceiling and the proposed US budget grows evermore misleading and absurd. A (temporary?) headline in the Washington Post today read: "Obama forges ahead in debt negotiations". This leads you to a second headline that you can click on: "Obama will still seek a $4 trillion debt deal despite GOP opposition, aides say". The lead paragraph below the headline reads: "Two of President Obama’s top advisers said he will continue to press for a far-reaching, $4 trillion deal to cut the deficit when he meets with congressional leaders on Sunday evening, despite new opposition from Republican leaders to such a compromise."
While I think that the Republican position on the budget/debt issue is as absurd as the Democrats, I think it was wrong for the Post to imply that the Republicans are obstructing Obama's (negative) debt reduction proposals. The Republicans want to cut the proposed spending, yet the Post makes it appear that it is what the Republicans are obstructing. Twisted logic.
According to this website the deficit for FY2011 is projected to be $1645.12 billion. In FY2008 the budget deficit totaled $458.55 billion. So in three short years the deficit has nearly quadrupled and the Post fails, in this article, to acknowledge the growth in deficit spending. How misleading can the Post get?
Obama has proposed record deficit spending. In response to the growing public outcry Obama appears to be considering reducing spending by some minor amount (but still increasing the deficit). So, to be credible, the headline should have read something like: "In the face of stiff Republican opposition Obama considers retracting his proposals for record deficit spending".
To help describe Obama's bait and switch on the debt ceiling/budget, I posted the allegory below as a response to the Economist article "Bargaining and blackmail"
------------------------------------------------------------------
As an allegory, the bride before marrying Obama proposed to buy a $30,000 car for a family road trip vacation following the marriage. After getting married, Obama sees a nice top-end $100,000 dollar car for his trips to the golf course. When the family hears about it they scream in agony. As a compromise, Obama proposes to buy a more modest $50,000 car [for] visiting the golf course. Obama at the dinner table proudly proclaims that he has now saved the family $50,000 so there is nothing to worry about. What he does NOT tell the family is that he is still spending $20,000 more than originally proposed. Why the media fails to mention this discrepancy is a mystery.
As for the family road trip vacation; can't be done because of the need to trim costs due to the green fees.
While I think that the Republican position on the budget/debt issue is as absurd as the Democrats, I think it was wrong for the Post to imply that the Republicans are obstructing Obama's (negative) debt reduction proposals. The Republicans want to cut the proposed spending, yet the Post makes it appear that it is what the Republicans are obstructing. Twisted logic.
According to this website the deficit for FY2011 is projected to be $1645.12 billion. In FY2008 the budget deficit totaled $458.55 billion. So in three short years the deficit has nearly quadrupled and the Post fails, in this article, to acknowledge the growth in deficit spending. How misleading can the Post get?
Obama has proposed record deficit spending. In response to the growing public outcry Obama appears to be considering reducing spending by some minor amount (but still increasing the deficit). So, to be credible, the headline should have read something like: "In the face of stiff Republican opposition Obama considers retracting his proposals for record deficit spending".
To help describe Obama's bait and switch on the debt ceiling/budget, I posted the allegory below as a response to the Economist article "Bargaining and blackmail"
------------------------------------------------------------------
As an allegory, the bride before marrying Obama proposed to buy a $30,000 car for a family road trip vacation following the marriage. After getting married, Obama sees a nice top-end $100,000 dollar car for his trips to the golf course. When the family hears about it they scream in agony. As a compromise, Obama proposes to buy a more modest $50,000 car [for] visiting the golf course. Obama at the dinner table proudly proclaims that he has now saved the family $50,000 so there is nothing to worry about. What he does NOT tell the family is that he is still spending $20,000 more than originally proposed. Why the media fails to mention this discrepancy is a mystery.
As for the family road trip vacation; can't be done because of the need to trim costs due to the green fees.