Ketanji Brown Jackson Nominated to the US Supreme Court

[Steve R.]

He [Biden] also does things like declaring that the next justice he appoints to the Supreme Court will be a black woman. This is of course an outright violation of our employment laws that prohibit discrimination based on race and sex. He just should have shut his mouth instead of using this as a campaign promise. WHO CARES what color a person's skin is? WHO CARES what their genitalia look like? Neither have anything to do with anything let alone interpreting the law. The message this kind of announcement sends is downright evil. If I were a black woman, If I had any integrity or self respect, I would never accept a job that was only offered because I checked the right boxes. As a woman, I have faced my fair share of discrimination. I was once offered a job because I was a woman and the company had really poor EEO (Equal Employment Opportunity) stats so they really needed to hire a female manager. Of course I didn't know it at the time because I was qualified for the position but my boss had been pressured into hiring me and although he never came out and told me that he was pressured into choosing me, he treated me with such distain and disrespect it was a toxic work environment and I left within three months because as it turns out, I was working on their new HR (Human Resources) system so I was privy to the the HR stats and not being stupid, figured out why my boss hated me so.

There is a deeper, darker, and more nefarious implication of Ms Jackson's nomination to the US Supreme Court. On the surface, it is blatant disregard for EEO legislation as pointed out above. Moreover, this nomination is an outright rejection of the goals of the Civil Rights movement envisioned by Martin Luther King. King proclaimed that: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." Ms Jackson is being nominated because of the: "color of their skin".

This nomination is abhorrent as Biden has proposed to initiate (anti-White) racist polices. In his inauguration speech Biden declared "war" on (phantom) White supremacy, established that the federal decision process would be based on "equity", an Orwellian Newspeak term for making decisions based on race (not merit), and reaffirming the nomination of a Black female to the US Supreme Court. Based on connecting these invidual "dots" one can surmise that Ms. Jackson won't be making legal decisions solely based on the Constitution, but that her decisions will be heavily tainted towards advocating and implementing a "social justice warrior" perspective. This "seed' of disparaging the US Constitution as a basis for making Supreme Court decisions has already been laid by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who famously stated: "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

The appointment, should Ms. Jackson be confirmed, will: 1) minimizing the Constitution as the basis for making decisions, and 2) further politicize the Court. The Justices making decisions based on ideology and not the Constitution.

Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson, a politician in robes

The selection of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to replace Justice Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court was widely expected. From the start of his administration, Joe Biden has made it clear that his top priority is paying back the liberal Arabella...

www.foxnews.com

... Joe Biden has made it clear that his top priority is paying back the liberal Arabella Advisors dark money network that spent over one billion dollars to help elect him and Senate Democrats.

These Arabella-advised groups seek nothing less than the appointment of politicians in robes who will rubber stamp their left-wing political agendas from the bench.

 

[Pat Hartman]

And if she even accepts the nomination we know what she is.

 

[Steve R.]

US senators should be asking Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson these questions | Fox News Video

Former New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte says the days of unanimous support behind a SCOTUS nominee 'are gone' on 'Sunday Night in America.'

video.foxnews.com

This is just one example of Democrats demanding that others treat those on the Democratic side with civility. Yet when Democrats are on the offensive, they will toss out civility and go for every dirty trick and personal smear conceivable to bring down those the Democrats consider to be "enemies of the state". Now, the Democrats do an about face and with a strait face demand civility?!?!?!

At the 1:20 mark, in the background there is a picture of Senator Mazie Hirono from Hawaii. Her adversarial performance at the Kavanugh hearing was an utter disgrace. Too bad, Gowdy didn't highlight that. Understandable as the focus of the monologue was Jackson.

 

[Pat Hartman]

The fact that she accepted the nomination which was made only because she is black and a woman shows what she is. No self respecting person who actually believes in the Constitution or equal rights would demean herself by accepting the premise that she couldn't make it on merit. Which I guess, tells us that in her heart, she knows she doesn't deserve the job and would never have been nominated had she not checked the right boxes at the right time in history.

 

[Steve R.]

The important part of the video begins around the 10 minute mark, where Will Cain speaks. Fortunately you can fast forward.

'Outnumbered' on media's double standard on Judge Jackson, Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Fox News Video

The panel reacted to the media's double standard when it comes to treatment of Supreme Court nominees as Judge Jackson undergoes questioning on Capitol Hill.

video.foxnews.com

First Black 'Woman' Nominated to Supreme Court Won't Define 'Woman'

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson refused to define the word "woman" but she and Democrats spoke about her role as the first black "woman" nominee.

www.breitbart.com

Two points stand out in Cain's monologue:

• Ketanji Jackson refused to define what a "woman" is. The simple answer, a person with XX chromosomes.There are numerous negative implications would appear to make her unsuitable to be a Supreme Court Judge.based on her refusal to define what a "woman" is. She is also demonstrating a deep misunderstanding of science. She is simply rolling with the current fanaticism of gender fluidity, which is "destroying" women's sports as one example. On a more humorous side, if there is no definition for the word "woman", then how can her nomination as a Black woman be considered historic? For all we know Jackson is really a White male who identifies as a "Black woman".
• Cain highlights that Jackson responses imply that her judicial philosophy (when given discretion) are based on what is considered "right" at the moment by the radical left. The US Constitution is supposed to be used by a Supreme Court Justice as the standard of review, not one's "feeling" about right or wrong. Does this mean, that if she becomes a Supreme Court Justice, that she would work towards dismantling the Constitution?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since posting; these video clips have become available. Also note, on the Tucker Carlson clip, at the 11 minute mark, that Carlson was censored (canceled) by Twitter. The Laura Ingraham clip is an excellent review of how Jackson should not be placed on the Supreme Court based on a lack of legal expertise and vagueness concerning judicial philosophy. Or to put it another way, Jackson makes decisions based on personal rationale (judicial activism), not the written law.

Tucker: No one in the Democratic Party cares what biologists think about biological sex | Fox News Video

Fox News host gives his take on Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson not defining what a woman is on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'

video.foxnews.com

Angle: Lawless & lame | Fox News Video

Laura Ingraham says Judge Jackson has found herself unworthy of the sacred trust we put in the judiciary.

video.foxnews.com

Judge Jackson refuses to define the word ‘woman’ | Fox News Video

Gutfeld and guests discuss Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson refusing to answer Sen. Blackburn’s question about how to define the word ‘woman’ on ‘Gutfeld!’

video.foxnews.com

Jason Whitlock on Supreme Court nominee refusing to define 'woman': The left is trying to 'dismantle truth'

Jason Whitlock reacts to President Biden's Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson's refusal to define what a woman is.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Steve R.]

Unfortunately the Senate voted to confirm her nomination.

Senate confirms Biden nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court

The Senate Thursday confirmed Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court and fulfilled President Biden's campaign promise to appoint the first Black woman to the high court.

www.foxnews.com

However, this should not be considered an historic event as being "Black" and "Female" are now undefined terms. Even if one considers that "Black" and "Female" have actual context, Biden's nomination would then have been a racist act as she is being "hired" based on the race and female check boxes.

Previously Biden blocked the nomination of Janice Rogers Brown to the US Supreme Court, who could have been the first Black female judge. Biden's action was reprehensible. A demonstration that Biden, in a negative manner, is a self-serving political chameleon changing his opinion based on politics..

Remembering the Black Woman Biden Blocked from the Supreme Court

President Biden wants credit for nominating the first Black woman to the Supreme Court. But here is the shameful irony: As a senator, Biden warned President George W. Bush that if he nominated the first Black woman to serve on the Supreme Court, he would filibuster and kill her nomination. The...

www.aei.org

"So, when Biden tries to bask in the glory of his historic nomination, remember Janice Rogers Brown — the Black woman who does not sit on the Supreme Court today because of Biden’s disgraceful obstruction."

 

[AngelSpeaks]

Three Republicans voting for her is hardly bipartisan.

 

[Steve R.]

Three Republicans voting for her is hardly bipartisan.

Can Romney, Collins, and Murkowski even be considered Republicans?

 

[AngelSpeaks]

Can Romney, Collins, and Murkowski even be considered Republicans?

My point exactly! Affirmative action in the US Supreme Court.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Chalk another one up for the return of racism Where the content of your character matters not but the color of your skin is everything.

 

[D_Walla]

Unfortunately the Senate voted to confirm her nomination.

Senate confirms Biden nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court

The Senate Thursday confirmed Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court and fulfilled President Biden's campaign promise to appoint the first Black woman to the high court.

www.foxnews.com

However, this should not be considered an historic event as being "Black" and "Female" are now undefined terms. Even if one considers that "Black" and "Female" have actual context, Biden's nomination would then have been a racist act as she is being "hired" based on the race and female check boxes.

Previously Biden blocked the nomination of Janice Rogers Brown to the US Supreme Court, who could have been the first Black female judge. Biden's action was reprehensible. A demonstration that Biden, in a negative manner, is a self-serving political chameleon changing his opinion based on politics..

Remembering the Black Woman Biden Blocked from the Supreme Court

President Biden wants credit for nominating the first Black woman to the Supreme Court. But here is the shameful irony: As a senator, Biden warned President George W. Bush that if he nominated the first Black woman to serve on the Supreme Court, he would filibuster and kill her nomination. The...

www.aei.org

It appears that it was a nomination to the Court of Appeal that Biden filibustered, and not to the Supreme Court (link). I would add that it is not as though Biden singlehandedly-blocked the nomination; he voted against Justice Brown's appointment along with the rest of the Democratic caucus. Also, it's worth noting the congressional record referenced by the AEI article that you linked to - that's a very long list of individuals/organisations that opposed Justice Brown's appointment, including: the Congressional Black Caucus, the NAACP, 200 law professors, and the National Bar Association, and quite a few others.

 

[AccessBlaster]

Clarence Thomas Receives Invite To Celebration Of First Black Supreme Court Justice

 

[Steve R.]

Just as a wrap-up since Ms Jackson has been confirmed to the US Supreme Court and the Court has now issued its first decisions with Ms Jackson on the bench. As expected she has disappointed by blindly voting in conformance with Sotomayor and Kagan to uphold leftist policies that undermine the Constitution.

 

[AccessBlaster]

Of course, the response of the left will be pact the court with more knuckleheads who can't define anything...Life is good!

 

[Pat Hartman]

Congress also fails us by not challenging the Supremes when they make law which they did with decisions like Roe V Wade and Obamacare.