Steve R.
Retired
- Local time
- Yesterday, 20:23
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2006
- Messages
- 5,521
First, may this new year be better than last year. Keeping up with improvements to electronic is mind numbing. Hard to believe, as time seems to fly faster and faster; but five years ago we bought a then "state-of-the-art" 4K (2160P) TV. The initial reaction, not much better than 1080P. As time progressed, we began to realize that the apps which came with the TV were never updated. Surprising
. We were interested in cutting cable and Hulu announced that they offered live streaming TV. We couldn't get it, despite the TV's Hulu app. Well, that problems was solved by us getting the Amazon FireTV as a gift. So we went along our complacent merry way.
Recently, we decided to extend out wired Ethernet cable to the TV (Hardwired as opposed to WiFi). That resulted in a marginal improvement in picture quality. This Christmas season there were numerous articles on new streaming devices, such as the Roku Ultra. Broke down and ordered one. Set-up went well, except it informed us that 4K was not possible
. Frantic, search of the product specifications for both the TV and the Roku ensued. Yes, 4K was possible, it turned out that only one of the 5 HDMI ports on the TV would support 4K @60Hz. The Roku had to be (hard) set for a generic 4K HDMI port. This has resulted in further picture quality improvements over the now very old Amazon FireTV. Hey, we even got a TV volume control on the remote now!
The TV has a total of 5 HDMI ports that can, according to the manual, produce a 4K image. But 4 of those ports operate @30Hz and the Roku "rejects" those ports. So the TV, by today's4K standards is now very sub-standard. That is the way things go as our electronics improve. I found one comment that raises a smile about keeping-up, where a person wanted to "future proof" his computer graphic card. A responder comment (paraphrased) "You can't be chasing utopian unicorns". Fortunately, the TV did have one HDMI port that the Roku could transmit a 4K signal to. So, in the near future, assuming a decent price drop in OLED TVs, a new TV will be on the horizon.

Recently, we decided to extend out wired Ethernet cable to the TV (Hardwired as opposed to WiFi). That resulted in a marginal improvement in picture quality. This Christmas season there were numerous articles on new streaming devices, such as the Roku Ultra. Broke down and ordered one. Set-up went well, except it informed us that 4K was not possible

The TV has a total of 5 HDMI ports that can, according to the manual, produce a 4K image. But 4 of those ports operate @30Hz and the Roku "rejects" those ports. So the TV, by today's4K standards is now very sub-standard. That is the way things go as our electronics improve. I found one comment that raises a smile about keeping-up, where a person wanted to "future proof" his computer graphic card. A responder comment (paraphrased) "You can't be chasing utopian unicorns". Fortunately, the TV did have one HDMI port that the Roku could transmit a 4K signal to. So, in the near future, assuming a decent price drop in OLED TVs, a new TV will be on the horizon.