A Very Interesting Observation (1 Viewer)

[Steve R.]

American ballerina with dual citizenship arrested in Russia, facing life in prison for donating $51 to Ukraine

A 33-year-old amateur ballerina with dual U.S.-Russian citizenship has been arrested in Russia and is facing life in prison for donating $51 to Ukraine, authorities say.

www.foxnews.com

Seems that Biden, Trudeau, and Putin all like to use the power-of-the-state to harass their political opponents.

 

[ebs17]

to harass their political opponents

Then you've probably already put some warm underwear in order to be prepared for being sent to a prison camp in the Aleutian Islands?

 

[Steve R.]

Then you've probably already put some warm underwear in order to be prepared for being sent to a prison camp in the Aleutian Islands?

I just hope they serve good food. Looking forward to the weather!

PS: Seems that an intrepid reported was able to get a picture of Biden in his indigenous native dress.

 

[Isaac]

I don't know, I don't think so.
In familiar conversations with other autocrats (Putin, Kim Jong-un), Trump is certainly at a great advantage.

There's only one small problem with your interpretation of things: The policies that Trump supports actually give freedom back to the citizens of the United States, for the most part.

 

[moke123]

There's only one small problem with your interpretation of things: The policies that Trump supports actually give freedom back to the citizens of the United States, for the most part.

which ones?

 

[Isaac]

Deregulation generally

 

[The_Doc_Man]

Considering that a lot of the Executive Branch regulations were imposed without Congressional action, the regulations are frequently going to be technically unconstitutional, but they are in place due to an old and very bad precedent. And if that "Chevron Deference" precedent is overturned (up for review by SCOTUS this year), all "regulation by executive fiat" will be open to charges of being unconstitutional because of bypassing the "separation of powers" clause. It will be chaotic. But given the mess that the government has made for itself, it NEEDS to be dusted up a little.

 

[Isaac]

Also, tax cuts and smaller government so that each person's destiny is more shaped by their choices than government handouts (in some cases) or government stealing one's money from one's paycheck (other cases that do the Giving)

 

[Pat Hartman]

When the government decides to take money from one citizen to give it to another that it has deemed more worthy, it is theft. Plain and simple. It is NOT charity. Charity is that which we WILLINGLY give to those WE wish to help. You can't force me to give to YOUR charity unless you are the government and you have guns.

Many government programs that "help" the less fortunate sound good and we are intimidated into not protesting the theft of our money lest we be called names. But the government should NOT be in the business of "helping" people. That should be left to actual charities and social groups.

 

[Steve R.]

 

[Pat Hartman]

They only way he can win is if he's the only name on the ballot - unless they cheat again.

 

[Steve R.]

They only way he can win is if he's the only name on the ballot - unless they cheat again.

By coincidence, Raskin has already taken up the challenge. Of course, with the current House, this is pure political theater that will never materialize. But then the Democrats successfully subverted the Patriots Act in an attempt to get Trump, which essentially crippled the Trump administration for his entire presidency. With that in mind, the Democrats may attempt to pass Raskin's proposed legislation in the future when they have control of the government.

Raskin: "The Supreme Court Punted And Said It's Up To Congress To Act" On Trump Ballot Access

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) on Monday said he is reviving legislation to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the presidency. Raskin told CNN host Dana Bash that the Supreme Court "punted" on the Colorado decision by overturning it and it is now "up to Congress to act."

 

[Pat Hartman]

And so, I am working with a number of my colleagues, including Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Eric Swalwell to revive legislation that we had to set up a process by which we could determine that someone who committed Insurrection is disqualified by Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

These people are complete morons. Trump was never convicted of Insurrection. He was never charged with it. We're back to the French Revolution again with the j'accuse. All you have to do is to accuse your political opponent and the red queen comes screaming into the room "off with his head".