Biden Confirms That His Administration Was Corrupt

[Steve R.]

Biden Preemptively Pardons Milley, Fauci, and January 6 Committee Members

President Joe Biden preemptively pardoned former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Retired Gen. Mark Milley, Anthony Fauci, and members of the January 6 Committee -- with just hours left in his administration.

www.breitbart.com

It would seem that this constitutes an abuse of the pardon power as it appears that the "crimes" for which these people are being pardoned for have not been specified. There is an irony in this; the "crimes" that Trump was accused of in his hush money case (Judge Juan Merchan) were never actually specified, so Trump was found "guilty" of some undefined "crime" in the best tradition of Stalinist justice as expressed by Lavrentiy Beria: "Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime”

Read more at: https://www.oxfordeagle.com/2018/05/09/show-me-the-man-and-ill-show-you-the-crime/
.

Based on the discussion concerning the Hunter Biden case; those who have been pardoned can still be forced to testify. They can't use the 5th Amendment to avoid answering questions. Should they lie they could be found guilty of a crime.

Consider the two statements below by Biden.

I believe in the rule of law, and I am optimistic that the strength of our legal institutions will ultimately prevail over politics.

The issuance of these pardons should not be mistaken as an acknowledgment that any individual engaged in any wrongdoing, nor should acceptance be misconstrued as an admission of guilt for any offense.

Biden says that he believes in the rule of law yet he issues pardons while asserting that there is no suggestion of guilt. Pardons, imply that a crime has been committed and is being granted a humanitarian gesture. What are their crimes then? Biden also said that he would not interfere in his sons legal issues, yet Biden interfered by issuing a pardon. Biden, if he actually believed in the rule of law, would have let the potential prosecution of all the pardoned individual to proceed. After-all that was Biden's (false) claim concerning Trump's legal problems.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1881345527973073009

Maria Bartirom raises an issue that I missed. What about all the Jan6th political prisoners? Where was his compassion for them? Biden ignored them.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1881337305908105358

Biden is was a vile vindictive lawless corrupt president, soon now to be out of office.

 

[AccessBlaster]

Unfortunately Trump is his own worse enemy, he tends to telegraph his intentions. Either that or he never had any intention to prosecute these people, but instead causing Biden to look even more irrational than usual.

Remember he said "lock her up" but never did.

 

[Steve R.]

Biden says he would not use preemptive pardons. Liar.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1881359595383468358

 

[AccessBlaster]

Biden says he would not use preemptive pardons. Liar.

That's a given

 

[Cotswold]

Biden looks like he's had another facelift as he has certainly changed from a year or two ago. Haven't his little piggy eyes have gone narrower looking?
If he carries on like this his ears will end up at the back of his head.

They crown Donald today don't they?

 

[Steve R.]

Evidently, Biden still had more "gift" pardons to handout.

Biden announces blanket pardon for his brother James, burying family influence-peddling probe for good

WASHINGTON — President Biden issued a pardon Monday for his brother James Biden, effectively burying the final details of a more than five-year probe into the first family’s influence-peddlin…

nypost.com

 

[Steve R.]

Well Schumer stated preemptive pardons are wrong. Will he call-out Biden now?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1881363897330086181

 

[Pat Hartman]

Schumer is as scummy as they come and Biden is worse. At least Biden proved that Trump was right all along. The whole Biden crime family was going down as well as the Jan 6th commission.

Maybe the Supremes won't let the pardons stand since they don't mention a crime. The DOJ needs to get the hearings going while the criminals can't invoke the 5th. Then by the time the Supremes rule on the pardons, they will already have incriminated themselves.

 

[Steve R.]

Maybe the Supremes won't let the pardons stand since they don't mention a crime.

There is another potential issue that the Supremes could consider: Was Biden mentally fit to sign those pardons?
Was he aware of what he was signing?

 

[Cotswold]

DJT's speech sounded promising. Interesting times ahead.

Real pity that we are held back by Starmer and his cronies at this time.

 

[Isaac]

Schumer is as scummy as they come and Biden is worse. At least Biden proved that Trump was right all along. The whole Biden crime family was going down as well as the Jan 6th commission.

Maybe the Supremes won't let the pardons stand since they don't mention a crime. The DOJ needs to get the hearings going while the criminals can't invoke the 5th. Then by the time the Supremes rule on the pardons, they will already have incriminated themselves.

I very very highly doubt that the supreme Court would intervene or second guess any presidential pardon that's just my personal feeling

 

[Steve R.]

Consider that Trump gave those illegally persecuted by the Jan 6th Committee pardons, while Biden gave pardons to the criminals persecuting those arrested for rallying on January 6th. Biden was lawless as president and used the pardon process to protect those who violated the law. Biden endorsed the official use of government power to pursue criminal actions against his political enemies. Politically, Biden was essentially a Stalinist.

 

[Pat Hartman]

I very very highly doubt that the supreme Court would intervene or second guess any presidential pardon that's just my personal feeling

Someone has to bring a case. If the DOJ interrogates all the suspects and due to their current lack of protection of the 5th Amendment, manage to gain actual proof of the crimes, then they can challenge the pardon and go from there.

 

[Isaac]

Someone has to bring a case. If the DOJ interrogates all the suspects and due to their current lack of protection of the 5th Amendment, manage to gain actual proof of the crimes, then they can challenge the pardon and go from there.

Oh I agree that it's possible to find a plaintiff withstanding, I just doubt the supreme Court will choose to overrule or intervene

 

[Steve R.]

I just doubt the supreme Court will choose to overrule or intervene

A difficult "nut" to crack.

• Too many cases are now being appealed directly to the Supreme Court. In theory, the Court should not act until the appeal process has run its course through the lower courts.
• The Democrats are making a mockery of the rule-of-law and the judicial process. They are making outlandish baseless claims, that are time sensitive, "forcing" the Supreme Court to take up a case. These include attempting to knock Trump off the ballots based on the 14th Amendment, claiming that Trump, as president, was not immune from the legal process, and claiming that a simple nondisclosure agreement somehow could be interpreted as a felony because it constituted election "interference". If the Democratic lawyers were sane, they should have refused to pursue these fantastical novel legal approaches. For Democrats the ends justify the means.
• When it comes the the J6th Committee, the Supreme Court may well pass on it as there are significant slippery slope interpretive questions that the Court may not want to delve into since the could be precedent setting. Specifically, the mental state of the president and the legitimacy of a preemptive pardon that does not specify a crime.

Below is an excellent summary (must listen to) of why the US Supreme Court should have taken-up Trump's nondisclosure case (which counters, to a degree, my first bullet point). Essentially, by not taking-up Trump's nondisclosure agreement the Court "allowed" a local prosecutor to usurp federal law. In this case the Court should have immediately shutdown that line of thinking so that it would be unavailable to future prosecutors.

Tremendous damage has been done to the rule of law, says Mark Levin | Fox News Video

Fox News host Mark Levin gives his take on President Biden’s Department of Justice on ‘Life, Liberty & Levin.’

www.foxnews.com