Ha ha - man, that's great! Embedded macros in the Property pane. I promise I won't "get started" on my thoughts on that.
Sometimes it makes it really hard to find stuff in those more obscure design layers, that's for sure! Great ideas everyone, this thread has a lot of useful information in it actually.
I will remember Vtools and Philip's product for a future need - and the Documenter, which I used a handful of times and then forgot it. I think I used it once in response to a particularly annoying Project Mgr who wanted full documentation--Yesterday. Sent him that and didn't hear back for a while! LOL.
(C'mon Microsoft...Give us a Master Ctrl+F function!)
Yeah well it wasn't without it's (usual MS) hiccups either:
Then when I tried to export to Excel:
I've quit using macros months ago. FYI.
Also: my institution won't pony-up for the 64-bit office, nor more than 4GB RAM, I wonder if the above overflow would've happened with 64b & 32GB RAM.
db debug ver.accdb
Form: RspndrSuffixSlctSubform Page: 942
Properties
...
Objects
...
Command Button: Choose_But
...
OldBorderStyle: 1 OnClick: [Event Procedure]
OnGotFocus: [Embedded Macro] OnGotFocusEmMac Version =196611
ro: ColumnsShown =0
Begin
Condition ="(Not [Forms]![Security_Current_User_Name]![RW])"
Action ="Close"
Argument ="-1"
Argument =""
Argument ="2"
End
Begin
Condition ="..."
Action ="MsgBox"
Argument ="\"You do not have permission to open this form!\""
Argument ="-1"
Argument ="4"
End
Begin
Condition ="..."
Action ="StopMacro"
End
Begin
Comment ="_AXL:<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-16\" standalone=\"no\"?>\015\012<UserInterfaceMacro
For=\"Choose_But\"
Event=\"OnGotFocus\"
xmlns=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/accessservices/2009/11/application\"><Statements><Co
...
The button had an embedded macro in "OnGotFocus"! (Duh). I didn't even notice that.
Enigma solved! Thank you all for helping.
Thank you very much for your ideas, and I have learned a lot.
Very cool - I like the highlighting. Recently my work has begun wanting excel apps that highlight or color only portions of cell text, so I am all about colorizations and visualizations in general these days.
That's one of the drawbacks of me being mostly just in the corporate world and only a few side projects here and there. Every time I change companies I tend to leave anything useful that I made, behind, committed only to memory.
@HalloweenWeed I assume it's the .xls at 65k rows or something. A++ on the macros...I think they're a good thing to leave behind. For a while I thought Access Web would be big and I would have to go to macros rather than VBA, but that seems to have fizzled out.
@HalloweenWeed I assume it's the .xls at 65k rows or something. A++ on the macros...I think they're a good thing to leave behind. For a while I thought Access Web would be big and I would have to go to macros rather than VBA, but that seems to have fizzled out.
It's weird, Sharepoint seems to be the new big thing here to bring user input to a central server database from the masses, but when I did a little bit of Googling on the subject and watching Sharepoint training videos it appears to me (I may be wrong) that a traditional database is still used, and Sharepoint is just the conduit. I still prefer Excel charts to anything I have seen from Sharepoint, and as a matter of fact I have created Excel workbooks that automatically get their chart data from Sharepoint. There is no argument against Sharepoint being a great improvement (over Access alone) though.
Yeah ... If you have NO other back end capabilities than Access, then it's better-than-not to have SP added to the toolbox.
Although I work for a big global company, my specific dept has been fighting to get SQL Server access and we haven't (yet). I miss it, and am not used to not having it. In its absence, people have gotten used to using SP for absolutely "everything", short of major enterprise apps. I've been on a campaign to educate and persuade that in some cases we might be over-using SP if an Access app could be much more infinitely and quickly customized. Add to all this that we aren't given SP Designer! We're still on SP 2010 and using, embarrassingly enough, Infopath.
Then again, faced with the limitations, I've been fighting to learn every possible way that our globally deployed Excel workbooks might interact with Sharepoint. It's crazy...every environment has its own unique mixture of what is allowed and what perceptions there are about stuff.
I think you're right, SQL Server is SP backbone. But how 'open' things are is all up to your Sharepoint Admins (I call them SP Gods). Mine don't even have Workflows turned on...