Isaac
Lifelong Learner
- Local time
- Yesterday, 22:40
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2017
- Messages
- 9,901
+1 for MajP's comment about writing your own.
These record transpose type of needs with many pre-made snippets around the 'Net are a perfect opportunity to spend a few minutes and write your own.
You can always start with someone else's - but once you see what they are doing (you'll thank yourself for investing this time), you'll almost surely want to write your own - customized to the needs of YOUR data.
One of the most common difference might actually be simplicity - yours might not need all the bells and whistles, because others wrote theirs for a more varied set of contingencies; your data only covers one or some of those contingencies, likely.
Either way - similar to my opinion on tools that find or document aspects of an Access database - I think it's a good and fun candidate to write your own.
These record transpose type of needs with many pre-made snippets around the 'Net are a perfect opportunity to spend a few minutes and write your own.
You can always start with someone else's - but once you see what they are doing (you'll thank yourself for investing this time), you'll almost surely want to write your own - customized to the needs of YOUR data.
One of the most common difference might actually be simplicity - yours might not need all the bells and whistles, because others wrote theirs for a more varied set of contingencies; your data only covers one or some of those contingencies, likely.
Either way - similar to my opinion on tools that find or document aspects of an Access database - I think it's a good and fun candidate to write your own.