Constant fake news

[Isaac]

It is so ridiculous how the mainstream media uses terminology to try to gaslight you. So a report just came out today that there actually WERE, at the Jan 6th ordeal, no fewer than twenty-six undercover people there at the behest of the FBI.

Fox News reports the truth, but CNN goes with this headline:

There were no undercover FBI employees at the Capitol that day, refuting suggestions from some GOP lawmakers that the violence was provoked by agents

If you just glanced over CNN headlines, you'd think the whole thing was false, as people like Thales have been saying - turns out, it was true.

What is their justification for lying in their headline? Turns out it's all semantics. Technically, the FBI people who were there aren't called "agents", they're called "confidental informants".

So if you were Snopes, for example, you'd rate the original supposition as "mostly true", or even more than mostly if you could.

Yet CNN says it's all just a conspiracy theory. Fake news - this is why I read CNN and MSNBC, but with a grain of salt.

It's like they're saying "They weren't there that day. Well, 26 of them actually were, but it's a total conspiracy theory".

So basically, Republicans were right ... or 99% right. Yet CNN still says it is a lie. maybe another "big lie" lol - yeah right, these people are terrible excuses for journalists.

 

[Steve R.]

DOJ IG reveals 26 FBI informants were present on Jan. 6

DOJ Inspector General said there were more than two dozen confidential human sources in the crowd outside the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, but only three were assigned by the FBI to be present for the event, Fox News has learned.

www.foxnews.com

FBI informants stormed Capitol on Jan. 6, but probe says bureau didn’t authorize it

The FBI had more than two dozen informants in Washington surrounding the chaos of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, and four of them entered the building as part of the protests, an inspector general said Thursday.

www.washingtontimes.com

 

[AccessBlaster]

It's going to be funny how fast the liberals go from totally trusting the system under Biden to totally mistrusting the same system under Trump. The hypocrisy will be glorious.

 

[Pat Hartman]

It's like they're saying "They weren't there that day. Well, 26 of them actually were, but it's a total conspiracy theory".

But Moke swears by them. No wonder Thales can't get his head on straight. I'm guessing it was far more than 26 and if NONE of them were authorized to enter the Capitol Building, why haven't they also been arrested?????? and charged with "insurrection" since THEY were the people agitating for insurrection, NOT the Trump supporters?

 

[AccessBlaster]

The last four years have been a real doozy for conspiracy theories coming true.

• The Lab Leak Theory
• COVID-19 Vaccines and Heart-Related Issues
• Government Surveillance Overreach
• Censorship and Collusion Between Big Tech and Governments
• Weaponization of Federal Agencies
• UFOs and UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena)
• Digital Currencies and Financial Surveillance
• Epstein’s Connections and Elite Networks
• Energy Manipulation and Climate Engineering

 

[Pat Hartman]

And there are many people here who still believe the lies and can link to the "fact checker" articles to "prove" it

 

[Isaac]

90% of them come true because no matter how many times liberals say it ain't so, there is great value in adding INSTINCT and EYEWITNESS EVIDENCE to the limited value of "studies". Studies show everything, even contradictions. Any decent researcher can find what appears to be contradictions on any subject.

 

[The_Doc_Man]

Any decent researcher can find what appears to be contradictions on any subject.

You must remember the Oxford law of experts ... you can take all the experts of some subject from all over the world, lay them end to end, and still not reach a conclusion.