The people who control the media...But who defines if it is a conspiracy theory or just a theory?
My point exactly.The people who control the media...
It always seems to me that the harder one side tries to squash an opposing theory, the more credence I should give to the opposing theory. Rather than looking for more proof or more convincing proof, they just do their best to cancel any who disagree with the "correct" opinion.But who defines if it is a conspiracy theory or just a theory? That is kinda my point in all of this.
Or even:
Start-----ConspiracyTheory-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TodayWell
I bet the media puts computer chips in the covid vaccine, then controls your mind, then makes you confused so you don't understand the news.My point exactly.
That would be the obvious reasonI bet the media puts computer chips in the covid vaccine, then controls your mind, then makes you confused so you don't understand the news.
Who would be on this cancelling body, and what does cancelling entail?That would be the obvious reasonHow clever you are to see it. But, I'm pretty sure if you said that out loud to anyone you would be cancelled quickly and firmly.
Democrats.Who would be on this cancelling body, and what does cancelling entail?
Nearly right. Instead, the media uses computer chips in your computer to disseminate fake news, but fails to control Republican minds. They only get confused because of the nonsense the media disseminates when compared to the facts. Look at the Russia collusion hoax that caught gullible Democrats hook, line and sinker, a corruption that was blatantly obvious to Republicans.I bet the media puts computer chips in the covid vaccine, then controls your mind, then makes you confused so you don't understand the news.
This reminds me a bit of an argument about the incredible unlikeliness of the Universe existing, because you had to have the physics set up in a certain way to maintain any kind of equilibrium
Here Here!My usual response to this is simple: The universe exists. We are in it. But the universe was not fine-tuned for us. It came first. WE came second and WE are what evolved to exist in the only universe we had. The "fine-tuned universe" argument is actually just Man's over-active ego speaking.
You mean like the one that says we are powerful enough to control the climate if we will only stop emitting greenhouse gassesThe "fine-tuned universe" argument is actually just Man's over-active ego speaking.
Pat, that was a non-sequitur to the previous comments.You mean like the one that says we are powerful enough to control the climate if we will only stop emitting greenhouse gassesAll the US has to do is revert to around 1600 AD and that solves the entire problem because the US is the proximate cause of climate change. The rest of the world can continue on in the modern era using all the fossil fuels they want.
Who would be on this cancelling body, and what does cancelling entail?