Expel Wayward Republicans from the Senate? (1 Viewer)

Yeah, a huge chunk of U.S. military spending, especially in classified programs, operates with minimal public oversight. The Pentagon’s budget is massive over $800 billion annually and a significant portion goes toward "black budget" programs, which fund secret operations, advanced weapons development, and intelligence efforts.
 
Yeah, a huge chunk of U.S. military spending, especially in classified programs, operates with minimal public oversight. The Pentagon’s budget is massive over $800 billion annually and a significant portion goes toward "black budget" programs, which fund secret operations, advanced weapons development, and intelligence efforts.
The big problem isn't the "black budget". The problem is weapon systems that are kept going because the plant in some congressmen's district. The quantity purchased is small and the unit cost high. For example the B-52 bomber was "replaced" with the B-1 and then B-2, which had smaller payloads and were only purchased in small quantities at huge prices (104 x B-1, 21 x B-2). They were so bad, that the B-52 is still in service, 63 years after the last one was built. The new B-45 program was started 14 years ago and only 3 planes have been built.

Dealing with this problem requires an organized approach.
 
The House Republicans as a sign of their total fecklessness declared time should stand still.

The national emergency law lays out a fast-track process for Congress to consider a resolution ending a presidential emergency, requiring committee consideration within 15 calendar days after one is introduced and a floor vote within three days after that. But the language House Republicans inserted in their measure on Tuesday declared that, “Each day for the remainder of the 119th Congress shall not constitute a calendar day” for the purposes of the emergency that Mr. Trump declared on Feb. 1.
Note that there is still one real Republican in the House, Rep. Thomas Massie (KY) who voted against this nonsense.
 
Maybe DOGE should be focusing on things like the high reimbursement rates to hospitals for medical procedures.
Maybe Congress should fix that problem. Why do you think Musk can fix it? The hospitals aren't technically cheating anyone. Medicare has payment rates for pretty much every service a hospital offers and Medicaid has even lower rates which is why no medical services want to accept new Medicare/Medicaid patients. Neither have anything to do with the rates negotiated by insurance companies. This is an ongoing issue and one that Obamacare SHOULD have addressed since no patient ever has any clue what any procedure that is covered by insurance will be billed at or what amount the insurer will actually pay. As I've mentioned on numerous occasions, if I have NO insurance, Bridgeport Hospital will try to make me pay $5,000 for a Cat Scan. But if I have insurance, my insurer will pay between $300 and $500. AND, if I can't pay my medical bill as frequently happens with illegal aliens, the hospital will report the loss as $5,000 because that is the amount the patient didn't pay and it doesn't matter what the hospital normally gets paid. That's how the stupid Obamacare got approved. Insuring the uninsured would "save" the hospital from the $5,000 loss that was bogus to begin with. The hospitals use cost accounting systems to amortize their capital costs and expenses across all items. The Medicare and Medicaid rates are more based on the reality of what something should cost.
The payroll cuts actually affect people who deliver services to the American people.
Most of the people on the government payroll are "overhead" and don't deliver ANY service. Look at the numbers for USAID. 20,000 employees but only ~250 are required to run the agency.
Do you think Musk's idea of cutting air traffic controllers was a good one?
If the system they use to track traffic were improved, perhaps the staffing level could be reduced. The reports say the current system uses floppy disks. I haven't had a system with them since the 80's.
Yes, DOGE should investigate in detail rather than make grandiose claims.
Determining if a person is alive or dead takes too much time. The regular staff should have been doing that as SOP in an on-going basis. At a minimum, they should have an "assumed deceased" status so they make sure to investigate before approving payments. The numbers of "probably deceased" should never have grown into the millions. Pointing out the potential problems should have been enough to light a fire under the normal employees. If someone pointed out that level of potential errors in any application I was responsible for, I would hang my head in shame and tear up my coding pad. Instead they "justified" the errors.

There is a huge amount of fraud in all the government systems. Large parts of the fraud could be uncovered by simply matching files with other agencies. The SSA knows when a person is paying SSA and Medicaid from multiple employers and it isn't hard to identify the likely frauds. How many people work in NC and Nevada at the same time? Why isn't this information given to the DOJ so they can find and prosecute the criminals? I'll tell you why. There is no governmental "will" to stop identity theft if it might involve illegal aliens.
 
Trump has already declared 1,2 & 5 off limits. 3 can only be reduced by increasing government revenue.
They are off limits regarding benefit cuts. You need to listen to ENTIRE sentences. Oh, that's right. Your news source leaves out words to change the meaning of what Trump says. Cuts are NOT off limits regarding waste, fraud, and abuse. Duh!
 
Determining if a person is alive or dead takes too much time. The regular staff should have been doing that as SOP in an on-going basis. At a minimum, they should have an "assumed deceased" status so they make sure to investigate before approving payments. The numbers of "probably deceased" should never have grown into the millions. Pointing out the potential problems should have been enough to light a fire under the normal employees. If someone pointed out that level of potential errors in any application I was responsible for, I would hang my head in shame and tear up my coding pad. Instead they "justified" the errors.

There is a huge amount of fraud in all the government systems. Large parts of the fraud could be uncovered by simply matching files with other agencies. The SSA knows when a person is paying SSA and Medicaid from multiple employers and it isn't hard to identify the likely frauds. How many people work in NC and Nevada at the same time? Why isn't this information given to the DOJ so they can find and prosecute the criminals? I'll tell you why. There is no governmental "will" to stop identity theft if it might involve illegal aliens.
Now we are dealing with an issue that the Access User's Group knows well, messed-up databases. The SSA has other systems in place to prevent payments from going out to the deceased, so they never bother to update the death information. I have to remind people that if you discontinue a product, you need to set the reorder point to 0, rather than rely on discontinued products from being excluded from reorder reports.

Dealing with messed-up data requires staff. Audits require staff.

However, don't say that there is a "huge amount of fraud" without evidence. SSA already has fraud-detection procedures in place, and we don't know if they are working. Claims of fraud allow politicians to pencil in savings without ever having to anything.
 
Dealing with this problem requires an organized approach.
No, it requires Congress giving up their position on pork. Instead of each member voting his own personal interests, they need to be voting the country's interests.

This is why when the Constitution was written, the Senate was appointed by the State legislatures. The Senate should be responsible to the people of the state and the country, not to the people of Groton. Then if Senators didn't serve their state, they could b e recalled and replaced. This was changed by the 17th amendment at the height of the progressive era.
 
No, it requires Congress giving up their position on pork. Instead of each member voting his own personal interests, they need to be voting the country's interests.

This is why when the Constitution was written, the Senate was appointed by the State legislatures. The Senate should be responsible to the people of the state and the country, not to the people of Groton. Then if Senators didn't serve their state, they could b e recalled and replaced. This was changed by the 17th amendment at the height of the progressive era.
Organized approaches have worked. The military base closure process under Goldwater-Nichols save a lot of money.

Why would Senators being elected by the state legislature rather than the voters would increase accountability?
 
However, don't say that there is a "huge amount of fraud" without evidence. SSA already has fraud-detection procedures in place, and we don't know if they are working. Claims of fraud allow politicians to pencil in savings without ever having to anything.
The SSA admits to the fraud. Fraud goes beyond payments to dead people BTW. And there is simply no excuse for not keeping a clean database as you pointed out. Look at all the people who collect SS due to disabilities. Leave NOTHING that can cause confusion during an audit.
 
However, don't say that there is a "huge amount of fraud" without evidence. SSA already has fraud-detection procedures in place, and we don't know if they are working. Claims of fraud allow politicians to pencil in savings without ever having to anything.
What more evidence do you need? The last audit of the system was done recently and they found nearly 72 Billon in fraud, made recommendations, and nothing was implemented to fix the problem. You can do all the audits you want, and if nothing is corrected, it is meaningless.
 
What more evidence do you need? The last audit of the system was done recently and they found nearly 72 Billon in fraud, made recommendations, and nothing was implemented to fix the problem. You can do all the audits you want, and if nothing is corrected, it is meaningless.
No amount of evidence will ever satisfy @RogerCooper. He will always demand more, and more, and more ....
 
Organized approaches have worked. The military base closure process under Goldwater-Nichols save a lot of money.
Bigger is not always better. It is far better for the country's security to have the military distributed. That also means that we shouldn't have ONE shipyard to build subs. We should probably have at least four, etc. Granted, a land invasion is unlikely but given the pissing contest we are currently having with both Canada and Mexico, anything could happen. Plus, China is already gaining footholds in Central America and the islands of the Caribbean so they will eventually have us surrounded.
 
What more evidence do you need? The last audit of the system was done recently and they found nearly 72 Billon in fraud, made recommendations, and nothing was implemented to fix the problem. You can do all the audits you want, and if nothing is corrected, it is meaningless.
According to that report, the improper payments were less than 1% of the total paid and it does not say that it was fraud.
 
If Trump keeps deporting Venezuela gang members and securing the border, that's a huge improvement over past administrations. Everything else is gravy.
Consider the optics of this.
  • Trump expels gang members from the US. Democrats go ballistic; they file law suits claiming that those who came here illegally have "rights".
  • Democrats openly "imported" illegal immigrants. In violation of US immigration laws. Democrats did not file lawsuits against the Biden administration.
Conclusion: Democrats protect gang members from the law. Consider that this is also contrary to the (faux) Democratic party mantra that no one is above the law. Democrats do not believe in the law.
 
Consider the optics of this.
  • Trump expels gang members from the US. Democrats go ballistic; they file law suits claiming that those who came here illegally have "rights".
  • Democrats openly "imported" illegal immigrants. In violation of US immigration laws. Democrats did not file lawsuits against the Biden administration.
Conclusion: Democrats protect gang members from the law. Consider that this is also contrary to the (faux) Democratic party mantra that no one is above the law. Democrats do not believe in the law.
All persons in the United States have due process rights. Asylum seekers did not come here illegally, most presented themselves at the border in accordance with US law. And Trump deported them using the Alien Enemies act which only applies to countries we are at war with.
 
According to that report, the improper payments were less than 1% of the total paid and it does not say that it was fraud.
Now your going to redefine the word fraud or play the substitution game? What do you want to call it? This is merely an attempt to dismiss fraudulent findings from the auditors that affected 72 Billion dollars. I kind of like number 13 myself.

Take your pick:
  1. Deceit
  2. Misrepresentation
  3. Scam
  4. Cheat
  5. Chicanery
  6. Double-Dealing
  7. Fake
  8. Dupery
  9. Sham
  10. Swindle
  11. Treachery
  12. Bamboozlement
  13. Pulled a fast one
 
All persons in the United States have due process rights. Asylum seekers did not come here illegally, most presented themselves at the border in accordance with US law. And Trump deported them using the Alien Enemies act which only applies to countries we are at war with.
Baloney! Due process as interpreted by the corrupt lying Biden administration that claimed over four years that they were somehow powerless and that the border was closed. Yet the (powerless) Biden administration gave the Supreme Court the finger when it came to student loans. And, as Trump remarked, closing the border only required a new president.

The big lie!
 
All persons in the United States have due process rights. Asylum seekers did not come here illegally, most presented themselves at the border in accordance with US law. And Trump deported them using the Alien Enemies act which only applies to countries we are at war with.
No, you cannot just cross over the border waving your phone with an app saying you are OK to enter the country. We have proper areas to cross the border, the majority did not use that entrance at all. That whole scenario was all made up to make it seem legal and you fell for it. Show us where in the constitution where a president or it's administration can just wave anyone through unvetted and not through the proper border crossing area's. Total BS.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom