OMG!!!

How is the UK handling illegal aliens?
 
How is the UK handling illegal aliens?
We are going to send them to Rwanda (its in Africa) An agreement has been reached and we will start shipping them out.
Col
 
But what if they aren't from some African country? What if they're from Greece?
 
Pat, remember who replied to you. With Col, you have to consider there is a bit of leg-pulling.

As to the ones from Greece, we'll just have to avoid the slippery slope as best we can.
 
Pat, remember who replied to you. With Col, you have to consider there is a bit of leg-pulling.

As to the ones from Greece, we'll just have to avoid the slippery slope as best we can.
No leg pulling. This is true. Anyone who comes here illegally, and we get several thousand per week, mostly from Eastern Europe or Middle East may well find themselves on a flight to Rwanda. Their original country is immaterial.
Col
 
Yes, it is true. Lots of controversy over the idea.
 
I love the solution. I understand the Australians send them to an offshore island:) Not sure why Ruanda would agree to take the immigrants though if they are coming penniless and with no useful language skills. Is the UK bribing Ruanda?

My opinion on illegal immigration has changed dramatically over the years. Having Libertarian leanings, I have no problem with an open border. The problem comes when on my side of the border is a welfare state. That changes the complexion of the crossings. People who are not freeloaders come and go but the freeloaders break our laws and come for the free stuff.

When a few thousand people enter illegally every year, they are still criminals but we can absorb them and they are not a huge burden. When they come by the millions, it is an invasion and now I want my border to be closed and everyone who has crossed illegally returned to sender regardless of how long they've been here. We cannot assimilate that many people in any given year. They have to go. I'm quite OK with perp-walking them back to the Rio Grande and depositing them on the other side. Or, sending them all to Martha's Vineyard:)
 
Last edited:
I think we should take the most able-bodied and willing-to-work types among them, give them all full authorization to live here and work in the jobs that the young Americans will no longer take (and thus restaurants closing up their stores). Until all those jobs are FULL. Once they've shown up every day to work for 6 months, give them citizenship.

Then, take all the young Americans who weren't willing to work and send them to Rwanda, or really anywhere close. Get rid of at least several million Americans, I'd much rather have work and family oriented Mexicans in their place - but only to a numerical 'point' where it makes sense. Remove their authorization to come back for a decade.

After that, return to sender all the remaining immigrants who have been here less than 3 years, unless they have a legitimate asylum claim (and asylum must, obviously, be defined in such a way that it can't possibly apply to more than 10% of all immigrants).
 
Now that the governors of the border states are sending the migrants to "sanctuary" cities, the "sanctuary" cities are coming to understand the problem the totally open border is causing. Why should small towns across the border have to absorb THOUSANDS of illegal crossers each day??? Martha's Vineyard has signs declaring their "sanctuary" status all over town. But they were simply virtue signaling. They called the National Guard and deported the santuary seekers likity split even though they had job openings and empty rooms.
 
They understand they are caught in their own hypocrisy maybe, but if the press refuses to point out the hypocrisy nothing changes.
 
Hilarious that these megacities declare a state of emergency for a few thousand migrants on buses.

They've never thought what kind of emergency 250,000 of them cause to a few tiny border towns a hundredth the size of new York!???!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom