georgedwilkinson
AWF VIP
- Local time
- Yesterday, 21:31
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2008
- Messages
- 3,856
Don't you have the originals?
Alas, no (unless you count the CDs). I fear I've sold out to the technology monster.
Don't you have the originals?
Alas, no (unless you count the CDs). I fear I've sold out to the technology monster.
Only by you it seems.
If you go back and check the Billboard listings in the early 60's, the Popular charts were filled with artists like Andy Williams, Frank Sinatra, Nat King Cole, and the like. The Beatles were listed on the Rock 'n Roll charts until about 1967. At that time the Rock 'n Roll chart was replaced by the Rock chart. Most of the Beatles post 67 songs were listed on both the Popular and the Rock charts (known in the business as "crossover").
I do agree that their later music (starting with the Rubber Soul album) did not fit into any easily recognized category.
The Beatles are classified as Britpop since that's what they were. The Kinks (among others) would also fall under that category as well. That's the beauty of Britpop. you don't need to separate it between new and old because it's timeless.
What's wrong with the CDs?Alas, no (unless you count the CDs). I fear I've sold out to the technology monster.
What's wrong with the CDs?
I wouldn't argue with that except to wonder if it's worth the effortNothing. Just many people really appreciate the vinyl (as evidenced in post #162) and I never though of CDs as a high-fidelity format. Many of my most recent acquisitions were digital though I imagine I've owned just about everything I have now in one of many "hard" formats. I don't have any 8-tracks, reel-to-reel, or vinyl anymore and don't want to go through the effort of converting my cassettes to digital. All of my CDs are on my iPod.
Nothing. Just many people really appreciate the vinyl (as evidenced in post #162) and I never though of CDs as a high-fidelity format. Many of my most recent acquisitions were digital though I imagine I've owned just about everything I have now in one of many "hard" formats. I don't have any 8-tracks, reel-to-reel, or vinyl anymore and don't want to go through the effort of converting my cassettes to digital. All of my CDs are on my iPod.
I'm not American and thus don't use or need Billboard, this is taken from Yahoo answers
Rock and roll has and will be forever The Rolling Stones
and I don't rely on television for factsI don't use Yahoo, Google or any of the error prone information websites.
My point that the EARLY Beatles were a rock 'n roll band is taken from how they were listed in the trade magazines and from the documentary film "The Compleat Beatles" and was stated in that film by John Lennon.
If you still wish to dispute it, I suggest you dig up Mr. Lennon and argue with him.
That's before they became famous BrianI have the correct answer from the horses mouth, with apologies to my wife. She used to dance to the Beatles in the Cavern where they were advertised as a Rock and Roll band.
End of argument.
Brian
And if you attended that concert, what kind of music would you expect to hear...OPERA
I have the correct answer from the horses mouth, with apologies to my wife. She used to dance to the Beatles in the Cavern where they were advertised as a Rock and Roll band.
End of argument.
Brian
You boys should learn from him.
...where they were advertised as a Rock and Roll band.
That's the title of one of their tracks RonI fully agree with Brian :
and I don't rely on television for facts
And equally frustrating when the facts don't conform to your perceptionsLets face it none of the Beatles could convince Rich that they played rock and roll, when you know everything it must be a very frustrating life having to put up with us ignorant people.
Brian
That's the title of one of their tracks Ron