Yeah, we're pretty aware of that. It just seems insane that the people most capable of putting the time and energy into the process over and over again are the ones who need the benefits the least.JoeCruse said:Kraj,
from what I've seen with friends who have been nailed with a debilitating injury and can no longer work, it takes 2-3 shots at the application process before one is accepted, nowadays. And this is for persons, like your SIL, who are OBVIOUSLY disabled and no longer capable of working to support themselves. I don't know if this is part of the process to "weed" out the unworthies or not, but I've seen or heard of this in more than a couple of cases. Tell them to keep applying for it and to not give up.
Well that's all well and good, but you can't make social commentary in a vacuum. If you're going to evaluate whether a social practice is right or wrong, you have to do in the context of that society. Whether you like it or not, what is considered appropriate behavior depends on the culture of the society you're in.ColinEssex said:In other words its my thoughts on tipping - right or wrong - nothing to do with America / Japan / Timbucktoo / England / Scotland
We are discussing tipping. You presented your opinion, which instrinsically neither right or wrong. In the context of the UK and other places where tipping is considered completely optional, your opinion agrees with the social norm and is considered acceptable behavior. In the context of the US, where tipping is expected and reinforced by wage practices, your opinion is considered socially unacceptable.
Your refusal to apply your opinion to any social context means it has no relevance to the discussion because it is 100% hypothetical and has no implications in the real world whatsoever. That doesn't mean your personal opinion is wrong, it just means you've provided nothing that can be discussed.
Additionally, your poor behavior and refusal to appologize for that behavior simply reinforces the fact that you, personally, are not worth discussing anything with. I contributed to the conflict by making an unclear comment that was very open to negative interpretations. I would be more than happy to appologize for causing any hurt feelings, but why on earth should I when you intentionally attack me and refuse to offer any appology?