- Local time
- Today, 18:31
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2002
- Messages
- 46,700
Just FYI, in the armed forces of the US, the Biden administration wants to REDUCE the physical requirements for certain positions to allow women to qualify. Does that make any sense? Women can make lots of contributions to the military. There was a time when we were allowed to "test" people to decide where they would most benefit the armed forces NOT place them based on their preferences within reason. So if you qualify for a, b, c, you get to choose from those three options but you don't get to choose d. PERIOD. So what if women don't all qualify for SEAL training. A few will. If they can hack it, more power to them. I'm sure that there will be situations where having a female SEAL would actually be beneficial to a team but that doesn't mean you dumb down the whole program.
www.independentsentinel.com
And worrying about having enough flight suits to fit pregnant women is ridiculous. All those G forces can't be good for the fetus. And then there's the hormone imbalance of pregnancy. Fighter pilots can't have that kind of distraction. They need to be on ALL the time.

Most women fail US Army physical so the Biden army will reduce requirements
The US Army is considering reversing its “gender-neutral” physical since most of the women can’t keep up with the men. Hopefully, China, Russia, Iran, and other foes will do the same. All this proves Tucker’s recent point that a WOKE army is a weak one. Rollover or transfer your retirement...

And worrying about having enough flight suits to fit pregnant women is ridiculous. All those G forces can't be good for the fetus. And then there's the hormone imbalance of pregnancy. Fighter pilots can't have that kind of distraction. They need to be on ALL the time.