isladogs
MVP / VIP
- Local time
- Today, 16:35
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2017
- Messages
- 18,581
Having watched the whole interview with Pelosi, I'm basing my comments on the entirety, not on one carefully selected sentence out of context.Your spin versus mine.
Having watched the whole interview with Pelosi, I'm basing my comments on the entirety, not on one carefully selected sentence out of context.Your spin versus mine.
I wouldn't agree with that at all. a lot of the things that he promised were not things that are 100% quantifiable by numbers, but just to continue to protect certain things and to continue to challenge other types of things. And I see him consistently doing that. I'll admit it's a bit more subjective then things that lend themselves to hard fast numbers. Taking even just deregulation as a start is enough of a promise fulfillment for meFurthermore, Trump has fulfilled almost none of his 2016 election promises
See https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/I wouldn't agree with that at all. a lot of the things that he promised were not things that are 100% quantifiable by numbers, but just to continue to protect certain things and to continue to challenge other types of things. And I see him consistently doing that. I'll admit it's a bit more subjective then things that lend themselves to hard fast numbers. Taking even just deregulation as a start is enough of a promise fulfillment for me
Saw it too. My interpretation is just as valid as yours.Having watched the whole interview with Pelosi, I'm basing my comments on the entirety, not on one carefully selected sentence out of context.
If you remember, Trump was the one running around saying the election was rigged. Dead people are voting.What kind of a question was that? Has it EVER been asked before in the history of this country?
Other than the couple dozen of age appropriate women who have accused trump of ra** and sexual assault, he has been accused of raping a 13 year old along with his friend epstein. See Doe ( Katie Johnson ) v. Trump and Epstein. I believe Epstein settled it.They are still accusing Trump of anything they can think of except perhaps child molestation
Normally this is where isladogs would chime in demanding evidence or proof of accusations, but alas this is Trump and luckily your'e on the right side politically speaking.Other than the couple dozen of age appropriate women who have accused trump of ra** and sexual assault, he has been accused of raping a 13 year old along with his friend epstein. See Doe ( Katie Johnson ) v. Trump and Epstein. I believe Epstein settled it.
It's not clear. I've seen some articles that said Epstein settled for undisclosed sum. Also that she dropped case out of fear.Thanks @moke123
That made very unpleasant reading.
Are you saying there was an out of court settlement rather than the case was dropped?
Didn't miss them. I just try to avoid Whataboutism. And the former president has never been accused of being with Epsteins underaged girls, although it's been alleged he was banging Maxwell. Hillary didn't need Epstein. She had her own gig going in the basement of the pizza parlor according to Q.Speaking of Epstein's friends, you missed a very high profile prince who evades the FBI, a former president and his wife who spent time on the Lolita express, not to mention his island.
I think the difference is Red Skins is considered a derogatory reference to native americans.Isn't using native American imaginary in this way like the Red Skins football team?
As a Black American I may consider your reference to "Masters" as racist.So enjoy your logo for now because it will not be tolerated by your hero's (masters) much longer.
Except using a warrior head bonnet is said to be sacred.I think the difference is Red Skins is considered a derogatory reference to native americans.
Atlanta Braves, not so much. Tomahawk chop? Maybe.
Its the racist fans that come to games with their faces painted red. Sorta like running around in blackface.
Who knew, but feel free to use that card if it helps you.As a Black American I may consider your reference to "Masters" as racist.
Not quite. I think the Republicans are feckless pieces of s*** but the Democrats are just plain bats*** crazy. As you can see, they are cut from the same mold. Which is more dangerous? The Republicans who are hiding their heads where the sun doesn't shine or the Democrats who want to cancel anyone who disagrees with them? And you're correct. There was no challenge. There didn't have to be, the Democrats organized the deep state and the media to attempt a coup which may have succeeded with the enlistment of Faucci.Your views on the two parties are only too clear but as you well know the Democrats did accept the results in 2016. There was no challenge at the time.
He's quite right. There are also non citizens voting. Why do you think the Democrats are so dead against having a citizenship question on the census? It is because, we would be able to determine that there are 12345 citizens living in town xyz and so we should not have more than 12345 ballots and since we never have 100% turnout, anything approaching 100% would automatically be suspect.If you remember, Trump was the one running around saying the election was rigged. Dead people are voting.