Libre
been around a little
- Local time
- Today, 08:54
- Joined
- May 3, 2007
- Messages
- 660
It was a refreshing change to listen to the Democratic candidates debating. It seemed to me that in comparison to the narrow minded, parochial, and blustering Republicans, who would evade every question and instead spout their vitriol, the Democratic candidates were like adults who were setting a wonderful (albeit, lost) example to those truculent Republican children.
Bernie made it interesting, and did a creditable job up there. But after watching the Dems debate, I'm firmly in Clinton's camp. Bernie seems like a well intentioned and intelligent man, but when he starts saying we should break up the banks, tear down the prisons, and give free medical care and free college educations to all because it works in Scandinavia, he sounds like a nut.
Hillary has the force, the energy, the disposition, the smarts, the know-how, the presentation, and the cajones to be the President of the United States.
I know the Brits might wonder who I'm speaking about (might, I said) and the right wing of AWF will say I'm a hopeless liberal (and proud of it), but tell me who you think would make a better POTUS than Hillary Clinton. I've already suggested Michael Bloomberg - and I'd love to see him run. But he has no national presence (other than being one of the wealthiest people on the planet) and nobody has seriously said he even MIGHT run.
So for now, I'm all in for HRC.
All in. HRC.
Bernie made it interesting, and did a creditable job up there. But after watching the Dems debate, I'm firmly in Clinton's camp. Bernie seems like a well intentioned and intelligent man, but when he starts saying we should break up the banks, tear down the prisons, and give free medical care and free college educations to all because it works in Scandinavia, he sounds like a nut.
Hillary has the force, the energy, the disposition, the smarts, the know-how, the presentation, and the cajones to be the President of the United States.
I know the Brits might wonder who I'm speaking about (might, I said) and the right wing of AWF will say I'm a hopeless liberal (and proud of it), but tell me who you think would make a better POTUS than Hillary Clinton. I've already suggested Michael Bloomberg - and I'd love to see him run. But he has no national presence (other than being one of the wealthiest people on the planet) and nobody has seriously said he even MIGHT run.
So for now, I'm all in for HRC.
All in. HRC.