The comparison is not about influence.
To be fair, it is about influence because I asked the question about that comparison. My post link and quote are below.
Do you think the New York judge - who has already made a summary judgement against Trump in the property valuation case - should recuse himself, because of the vitriolic tweets by his wife towards Trump?
Source:
https://www.access-programmers.co.uk/forums/threads/election-do-over.314702/page-42#post-1901797
That image gives me shudders! Lock me up!
It is not for me to decide if Thomas is compromised or not. If he is, then in an ideal world he should recuse himself. It won't make any difference if he does or not anyway. However, there are circumstances where he should not recuse himself, even if compromised. If you zoom out from that case and look at the bigger picture, the Democrats have wrecked the democratic process. They talk about Trump being a threat to democracy whilst operating like a Russian dictator. When the Democrats have tilted the playing field and broken the justice system, why should the Republicans give them an unfair advantage by operating within rules they don't follow themselves?
Look at what is happening now:
Eleni Kounalakis said it was a 'dire matter that puts at stake the sanctity of our constitution and our democracy' - and denied that she was acting out of 'political gamesmanship'.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Stop Trump by any legal means. This is not democracy and it is shameful what the Democrats are trying to pull off. Ultimately, I think it will turn many undecided voters against the Democrat party because what they are doing stinks to high heaven. If they can't win in the ballot box, they try to do it by perverting the course of justice. And they complain that it was Trump was trying to hang on to power through their bogus insurrection claim.
What about Engoron, who donates to the Democrat party, despite it being against the code of conduct and ethics for judges? He has already proven his disregard for ethics by this very act, and an unethical politically biased judge who votes for the opposing political party can't be trusted to give a fair trial.