Election Do-Over!!!

Show me actual evidence that the election was rigged. Real evidence.
Start by watching 2000 mules to see how the ballot boxes were stuffed.
Do you think that the same person making multiple trips to multiple ballot boxes in the dead of night is normal? How about watching him remove his plastic gloves after depositing the ballots? How about viewing the GPS data legally purchased from the phone companies that show multiple trips from one single address to multiple drop box locations in the dead of night by multiple phones. So the single address was some type of ballot preparation site and the "phones" all belonged to the drivers making the deliveries.

Watch the videos of 4 people pushing the same batch of ballots through the scanner over and over and over again - AFTER everyone was sent home and the counting was officially stopped. We just had a similar video surface in Connecticut regarding the election for the Mayor of Bridgeport. The judge ordered that the primary be run again. Do you really think that someone made a set that looked identical to the counting facility and created people that looked like the actual workers? And then animated them to do things? This particular film can't be denied and wasn't. The Democrats just made up bullshit excuses that the people weren't actually doing what we were watching them do. Sort of like "those aren't the Drones you are looking for". There are others.

If you have any understanding of statistics, you can look at those presentations. Is it normal for vote counts to go up and down? Maybe once if they make a mistake and feed the same data file twice. But over and over again? Each time the result is the same. The Trump count goes down and the Biden count goes up. Statistically, shouldn't both sides be affected equally? Statistically what are the chances of hundreds of mail-in ballots with NO FOLD MARKS, all in a bunch with only one vote - for Biden - and no other boxes checked happening in the real world AND ending up at the counting site in a single bunch - really? I have a bridge to sell you? Somehow all the mail-in ballot envelopes got "accidentally" shredded even though all paper, etc is by law supposed to be kept for 2 years so there could be no verification that all the votes that were counted were actually received correctly and on time? So, who's to say that the votes with no fold marks are bogus? That's why they had to "accidentally" shred the envelopes. Do you think an envelope count might have confirmed that all ballots did not come into the counting house via proper channels? That isn't necessary proof of cheating but it sure is suspicious. I'm sure unmatched would be explained by the use of a transporter machine similar to the one used on Star Trek or perhaps some other "manna from heaven" reason.

Can you read what I said? The audits that could have proved/disproved wrongdoing were prevented by Democrats obstructing long enough for evidence to be manipulated. There is of course little chance of ever proving the manipulation at this point. But the total obstruction of any audits that might have revealed cheating were pushed long enough to eliminate any evidence. And that provides an important fact itself.

You keep saying the courts said no. What they said no to was hearing the cases. The judges went out of their way to NOT hear a case. They did not want to look at evidence because if they looked at evidence, they might believe it and the world would come to an end and their life would be ruined. Just look at what happened to the Supremes around the Roe v. Wade case. Mobs protesting outside their homes AGAINST THE LAW. Threatening their families and homes and they got NO police protection because their opinion on the case was not popular in DC. They know how the Democrats automate their brown shirts to terrorize the public.

You are reading the talking points but never examining the actual evidence that would have been presented in court. Please don't forget that going into the 2020 election our own FBI was giving misinformation to Facebook, Google, cable news, et al telling them that the Hunter Biden laptop was all a lie and was manufactured by Russia. Look how true that was. Do you think that maybe, some people might not have voted for Biden if they saw that he was implicated in a money laundering scheme and his son was the bag man as they wrangled money from foreign players all over the world? Money going into one of 22 LLC's (who needs 22 LLCs that don't actually provide any product or service but are simply used to launder money) Maybe Biden wouldn't be President today. THINK very carefully about who is telling you the truth.

For cases that were heard, the Trump side has a pretty good record of actually winning once the court gets to see actual evidence. Not that it matters at this point. No one can undo the transfer of power which happened peacefully. How about that? All those lies about Trump barricading the doors to the White House and refusing to leave - bullshit - and you believed all of it didn't you? You KNEW Trump wasn't going to without a fight. You probably discussed it with your friends.
 
Last edited:
They did.
Apparently you can't read either. The ballots and envelopes and counting machines were never secured. The audits were obstructed long and hard. Why???? Aren't you even a little curious? Why did the Dems push so hard to not allow audits if they had nothing to hide.

Rescanning ballots will only reveal two types of error.

1. some machine was malfunctioning
2. the same batch of ballots were scanned multiple times.

However #2 can be overcome buy producing enough ballots to match the counts and getting them inserted into the mix.
 
Show me actual evidence that the election was rigged. Real evidence. Not youtube, or other non verifiable sources. 61 Federal Courts said no. Trump hired 2 diferent companies to investigate and both said there was no fruad. Several states investigated and found that there was no fruad, I would ten to go along with that evidence.

Read this:

Because the 2020 presidential election results in several states were quite close, stakeholders took advantage of various state laws and procedures to allege incorrect vote counts and request recounts. The Trump campaign challenged the vote counts in some states and sought recounts in others. Georgia conducted a risk-limiting audit and two statewide recounts. Wisconsin, at the request of the Trump campaign, recounted votes in Milwaukee and Dane counties. Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania all faced lawsuits that alleged vote-count fraud and sought recounts. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson agreed to conduct a statewide election audit. The Trump campaign and various Republican organizations, candidates, and voters filed 10 “election contests” in Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada. None of these lawsuits or contests succeeded, and none of the recounts or audits changed the results of the election. This report surveys the vote recounts and election contests in seven battleground states.

She didn't say there was actual evidence. She just told you that the any potential evidence was conveniently scrubbed or avoided the audit, which is true. Read that again. We aren't saying there is evidence, we're saying there's a lot of circumstantial evidence but no hard evidence because people who wanted forensic audits that would have answered the question for sure were stymied - stymied by people playing-dumb-statements like yours, circular nonsense that says I refuse to look for evidence because you don't have evidence
 
They did.


There was an old saw regarding technical demo's."If you dont have the facts, baffle them with B---sh-t". It pplies here as well
 
There was an old saw regarding technical demo's."If you dont have the facts, baffle them with B---sh-t". It pplies here as well

If you consider re-counting the exact same votes, an audit for missing votes, which you don't if you speak english.
 
The swamp is the evidence....

1702590974108.jpeg
 
It's the subtle erosion or manipulation of evidence over long periods, that makes it hard to put a finger on exactly what happened in 2020. The Democrats are very good at this tactic for now but at some point, even a worm will turn and their complaints will rush in like they always do, the Republicans cheated.. blah blah blah.
 
There was an old saw regarding technical demo's."If you dont have the facts, baffle them with B---sh-t". It pplies here as well
As I pointed out. Recounting the ballots long after the election was over when none of the machines or ballets were secured and the envelopes mysteriously went missing is a waste of time. I'm not sure why they bothered.

A real audit would have counted the envelopes and compared that number to the ballots for starters. To enable accurate audits, the two envelopes Plus the ballot should end up in the same box so they can all be reconciled. PLUS all three parts must have the same unique ID number. Yes, you give up your right to an anonymous vote but that's the price for convenience. Some states vote on line. That means that no vote is actually anonymous.

To some, voting on line seems the ideal situation but that would make an audit virtually impossible because it would involve reaching out to each machine that cast a vote and comparing the local record with the received record, PLUS taking on faith that the software hadn't been manipulated.
 
Pat I think liberals are just in a grumpier than usual mood these days.

With blacks moving to the Republican party, several defectors moving from Dem to Rep., polls showing that even Trump would beat Biden in the general election by 10 points (and I"m guessing Nikki by 15), it's a very bad time for the Democrat party right now. Let's not gloat.
 
Pat I think liberals are just in a grumpier than usual mood these days.

With blacks moving to the Republican party, several defectors moving from Dem to Rep., polls showing that even Trump would beat Biden in the general election by 10 points (and I"m guessing Nikki by 15), it's a very bad time for the Democrat party right now. Let's not gloat.
Never forget Joe Biden outperformed his former boss Barack Obama by a whopping 11,785,484 votes. So with the help of a few cyber attacks, mail-in voting, and a future plandemic, he should be able to quadruple his past performance. ;)
 
Never forget Joe Biden outperformed his former boss Barack Obama by a whopping 11,785,484 votes. So with the help of a few cyber attacks, mail-in voting, and a future plandemic, he should be able to quadruple his past performance. ;)

Yes isn't it positively odd that the votes he supposedly received don't correspond with the exit polling? How interesting..
 
Yes isn't it positively odd that the votes he supposedly received don't correspond with the exit polling? How interesting..
Now, now. There is no place for logic when we are talking about 2020. Statistics are irrelevant. A man who couldn't get more than 50 people to show up at a rally when his opponent was drawing thousands and whose running mate was so unpopular she couldn't get 1% of the popular vote in order to stay in the primary, could get significantly more votes than the most popular (by vote total) president in history but only if you believe in miracles.

The same people who brought you Russia, Russia, Russia, and the Hunter Biden laptop is Russian disinformation brought you the results of 2020.
 
The next salvo in Trump's run for the White House is the Colorado Supreme Court, which removed him from the ballot using the "participated in an insurrection" charge. (Which will be appealed, of course.)
 
As if it is somehow ok to redefine the word insurectionist is going to work. If one political party says he is an insurectionist millions of times repeating the lie, that just means the witch hunt is alive and well. This will end up helping him in the end though. Colarado has been smoking too much dope lately.
 
I notice they are awaiting outcomes from dozens of other states too. It's ridiculous! I've never seen such tactics before, except in the banana republics and places like Russia.

Do you think the problem lays in how the justices are chosen, by political parties? I'm not sure how many other countries do it this way. Obviously, it also comes from the do-anything-to-stop-Trump screw democracy and don't let the voters decide attitude.
 
Last edited:
The next salvo in Trump's run for the White House is the Colorado Supreme Court, which removed him from the ballot using the "participated in an insurrection" charge. (Which will be appealed, of course.)
This is the Democrats protecting democracy!!!!!!:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

For the conspiracy crowd, one lawyer made a very acute observation of this decision. He noted that the Democrats started using the word "insurrection" immediately after the patriotic rally. He speculated that this was done on purpose. That this Colorado Supreme Court decision represents the "first" culmination of this approach. As outlandish this observation may appear, Democrats are masters of manipulating elections.

A couple of quick notes. The very day Trump was inaugurated, Democrats started demanding Trump's impeachment. During Trump's first impeachment, one Democratic Congressman actually advocated that Trump had to be impeached to "protect democracy". The anecdotal evidence is that the Democratic party, for whatever reason, has been consumed with hyperbolic Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) for over seven years now. This is insane fabricated and melodramatic partisanship by Democrats.
 
Last edited:
Do you think the problem lays in how the justices are chosen, by political parties?
That would appear to be the case. This decision along with all the lawsuits being filed against Trump seem to be filed by people affiliated with the Democratic party.
 
That would appear to be the case. This decision along with all the lawsuits being filed against Trump seem to be filed by people affiliated with the Democratic party.
Apparently, all the judges were chosen by the Democrat party. Four voted to remove Trump from the ballot, whilst 3 were against. Even nearly half of the Democrat judges thought it was a step too far.
 
Who brought this case against Trump? Is it the judges themselves or does it get referred to them by someone else?
 
Soon, when there are corrupt attempts to disqualify a candidate for political office in another country, they will stop saying, "Like a banana republic" and replace that with, "Just like in America". The Dems are trashing the reputation of the country as a place to get a fair trial. It started with the George Floyd trial and just continued from there.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom