Isaac
Lifelong Learner
- Local time
- Yesterday, 23:12
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2017
- Messages
- 8,792
Both parties have contributed to this without a doubt, especially at this stage of time when a certain minimum spending is considered obligatory in order to not let down promised recipients. Generally, the Democrats solutions are more geared toward spending money, while the Republicans' standpoint is more geared toward giving people opportunities and cutting government BACK to both allow and force people to be successful by traditional values like work, marriage, etc.
Excerpt:
The good thing is his reports make very fun reading.
Excerpt:
Other expenses highlighted were $659 billion for national debt interest, $33.2 million for transgender monkey research, $6 million for boosting Egyptian tourism, and an unknown cost for USDA's dog-walking research in summer.
"Researchers found the Labradors’ fur color did not affect their body temperatures after a hot summer’s walk. That’s it. That’s the taxpayerfunded, cutting-edge study," Paul wrote. "The Agricultural Research Service at the USDA, which funded the study at Southern Illinois University, gets $1.7 billion a year from Congress, but it’s unknown how much the hot dog study cost the taxpayer."
Rand Paul's 'Festivus Report' exposes $900B in government squander
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., released his ninth edition 'Festivus' report showcasing $900 billion in federal waste.
www.foxnews.com
The good thing is his reports make very fun reading.