Brianwarnock said:
Rich should be on the stage, we need some new comedians, politicians sensible , doing the right thing!, this lot have banned hunting foxes with dogs, any country person will tell you that is the most humane and selective way to do it, a fit adult fox will outrun a pack any time. The hunts take the old infirm and sick, the ones that cannot live as nature intended. Of course shooting is required in the suburbs.
Brian
I would think that you did some research before tagging me as a comedian on the subject Brian, I've never taken an anti foxhunting stance and I resent the charge.
In any event I'm afraid you're not correct, hunting with packs of hounds has been banned in this country, allowing those packs of dogs to tear either a fox or deer to pieces when trapped has been banned, fox hunting with two dogs is allowed, the stipulation now is that when the animal is caught it has to be shot and killed before the dogs are allowed to tear it apart.
However questions still remain and have never been debated in this country,
They are
Is fox hunting as we know it nothing more than a ritualistic bloodlust?
Is there a need to control the fox population, if it is then what is the best method?
Do you have a problem with the fact that the government whilst one hand resisted the calls to outlaw fox hunting all together made what I would say was the most sensible compromise, certainly given the fact that a great deal of the rural population here wanted no restrictions whatsoever.
Or do you think packs of hounds should be allowed to rip animals to pieces whilst their masters sit around watching with saliva drooling down their bloody lips, If that makes me stupid or a comedian then so be it.
Let me ask you this, why chase the fox or deer at all, why not just pull out a gun and shoot it to start with ?