DOGE (2 Viewers)

If that's the case better ice up that arm cause you're gonna do a lot of throwing.
Yup, the hypocrisy on the left is nothing short of amazing. Coal miners and oil workers can go pound sand. While government workers are sacred cows that vote leftwing. No wonder Clinton / Gore, and Obummer only talked about cutting the government.

1740516005835.png
 
Last edited:
If there was no federal income taxes due for this years taxes and going forward, the economy would be booming in very short order provided there wasn't any crazy printing of new dollars like sleepy joe did.
 
Just remember, not only physical printing works to expand the number of dollars in circulation. Loosening up credit at least indirectly has the same effect. There are other ways to do that as well. Which I'm sure our friend Thales750 would be happy to list.
 
If there was no federal income taxes due for this years taxes and going forward, the economy would be booming in very short order provided there wasn't any crazy printing of new dollars like sleepy joe did.
The Democrats love to print money. They apparently have no interest in cutting spending. So if we simply print all the money needed, there is no need for an income tax!
 
The only way to reduce the debt is by growing the economy.
Remember that when inflation, growth, and unemployment, all reflect the dark side.
This reminds me of me and my wife. I've always been focused on maximizing my earnings. She's focused on "what can we CUT". (which kinda makes sense because she wasn't the primary earner).

It seems some of both is needed though right?
 
Yup, the hypocrisy on the left is nothing short of amazing. Coal miners and oil workers can go pound sand. While government workers are sacred cows that vote leftwing. No wonder Clinton / Gore, and Obummer only talked about cutting the government.

View attachment 118750

So true. I am glad I likened this situation to the climate change issue, as there are so many parallels.

All the libs seem to easily understand & accept the idea of painful changes for the benefit of the climate, but they can't accept anything remotely similar for a problem just as important. the national debt
 
Speaking of DOGE and saving/spending money, what decides when the USA prints money versus legitimately borrowing actual money from somewhere? I suppose I could go to chatgpt for this and perhaps I will. But I don't mind getting my friends' perspectives either.
 
This reminds me of me and my wife. I've always been focused on maximizing my earnings. She's focused on "what can we CUT". (which kinda makes sense because she wasn't the primary earner).

It seems some of both is needed though right?
When you mix up micro and macro economics, you get mud. The rules are vastly different, they have almost nothing in common.
 
If there was no federal income taxes due for this years taxes and going forward, the economy would be booming in very short order provided there wasn't any crazy printing of new dollars like sleepy joe did.
Wow. so many people nowadays have no concept of circulating currency, or economic multipliers.
 
A ridicules analogy. Demonstrates your lack of understanding and credibility.

I think Trump broke his brain 🧠
Being ridiculed by you guys is truly a great compliment, and a challenge.

I've been thinking about this (unlike like you guys, thinking not feeling) for 40 years. To this day, undoing the conservative brain washing has proven to be one of the most difficult teaching experiences of my life.

No historical fact has any effect on you. No causality revels itself to you. No patterns emerge.

And here we are, conservative have always been brainwashed into blaming the government for all of their person inadequacies, and they self fulfill by voting in the worst possible folks.

DOGE will not change the debt even in the slightest, it will however, put people out of work, slow growth, reduce the ability's of our government to function, and then the idiot in Orange (as do his dito head followers) somehow believe that on top of all this, his tariff program is gonna fund the government.

Yeah, it must be me with the broken brain.
 
When you mix up micro and macro economics, you get mud. The rules are vastly different, they have almost nothing in common.
Exactly, rules for thee, but not for me. Macro politics in a nutshell. Economics is meaningless in a tyranny.

I've been thinking about this (unlike like you guys, thinking not feeling) for 40 years.
That's a pretty high sanctimonious pedestal you put yourself on. Maybe you can take Rachal Maddow's place on MSNBC after she gets fired. I'm sure her crew will buy all your BS.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom