selenau837
Can still see y'all......
- Local time
- Today, 05:22
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2005
- Messages
- 2,211
ColinEssex said:
Ahh, come on Col..that's all I get...*Gasp* I had at least hoped for a THWACK at least.
ColinEssex said:
Being an idealist, I prefer to see the good side of things until proven wrong. I realize I could be completely naive in this particular point of view, however...selenau837 said:So, you can’t convince me the Democratic party doesn’t prefer to keep their supporters down.
Kraj said:Being an idealist, I prefer to see the good side of things until proven wrong. I realize I could be completely naive in this particular point of view, however...
I would be very suprised if the Democratic party intentionally represses people by keeping them poor and ignorant. For that strategy to make sense, it would mean that any financially stable and educated person would vote Republican by default, which is clearly not the case. Also, I would think it a much better strategy to cultivate educated people able to support their families who are grateful to the Democratic party for helping them get to that point.
In my opinion, the situation you described is due to the person making decisions being completely disconnected from the real world of how things work (as is the case in many, many organizations), so that person decides that people in greatest need of the program fit such and such description and they draw an arbitrary cutoff line to fit the budget. I don't think it is a decision made with malicious design.
I would also put your theory to the test by looking at other factors. For example, the elderly are the biggest recipients of government money (welfare, food stamps, social security, medicare, etc.). If your theory is correct, the Democratic party's best interest would be to maintain the status quo and the Republican party's would be reform. Yet, the opposite occurs; the Dems call for Medicare and social security reform and the Reps don't dare touch the programs.
alastair69 said:Are you a red head Selena?
I'm pretty sure that's what most people do. I am curious, though, as to why you hold the Democratic party exclusively responsible for how your personal situation turned out. Surely you don't think the Republicans have no input into how the welfare programs function?selenau837 said:Yes due to my past history, I am VERY Jaded agianst the Dem party. So, in this case I guess I am using emotions to drive my party alligence than my head.
I'm INFJ. Us INFs gotta stick together.selenau837 said:However I am proud of the fact I can think with my heart, I feel it makes me a more compassionient person than those who don't. According to my Myers Briggs, I am an INFP...if curious look it up.
I hope you didn't take my comments as bashing! I'm not saying you're wrong, but I do disagree and I'm interested in discussing it further.selenau837 said:This is a warning..my claws are out if you start bashing me because I tend to be lead with emotions and feelings than with my head.
I dunno. I wouldn't blame my last girlfriend if she felt pretty scorned, but she seemed to get over it. (Yes, her hair was quite red.)selenau837 said:"Hades has no fury like a woman scorned, and heaven help anyone that scorns a red headed woman."
Oh, don't worry about me. I'm not actually fighting a battle, I'm just bitching about it.jsanders said:You are fighting a useless battle Kraj
jsanders said:So when the republicans convince single struggling moms that the local drug dealers are getting all the benefits of our society the local single mom goes out and votes in the guy who will authorize 500,000,000,000 dollars to democratize Iraq.
But hey it won’t happen to me because I’m an educated database developer.
I'm pretty sure that's what most people do. I am curious, though, as to why you hold the Democratic party exclusively responsible for how your personal situation turned out. Surely you don't think the Republicans have no input into how the welfare programs function?
I'm INFJ. Us INFs gotta stick together.
I hope you didn't take my comments as bashing! I'm not saying you're wrong, but I do disagree and I'm interested in discussing it further.
Oh, don't worry about me. I'm not actually fighting a battle, I'm just bitching about it.
jsanders said:The real problem in the American ethos is innumeracy, not illiteracy.
selenau837 said:Ok, I'm backing down. I will be more than willing to continue this debate once I have done some research on my own to support my ideas.
KenHigg said:>>>Note to self: Learn how to back off as readily as Selenau...<<<
Rich said:I'd just like to note for the record that it's American posters here who are squabbling amongst themselves, and yet the insults are slung at me and my mate
Squabbling or insults?KenHigg said:.
.
Where?
Rich said:I'd just like to note for the record that it's American posters here who are squabbling amongst themselves, and yet the insults are slung at me and my mate
No, not in the slightest and I don't think you should back down either, stand for what you believeselenau837 said:Ohh dear, was I one of them? I would hate to think I was slinging insults at y'all while discussing this with J.
Rich said:Squabbling or insults?
selenau837 said:Ok, I'm backing down. I will be more than willing to continue this debate once I have done some research on my own to support my ideas.
I may have taken your comments personally j.. I assumed they were being pointed in my direction since you kept commenting on 'struggling single moms'. If not, then I apologize for assuming, and so, I apologize to the other forum for allowing you to rile me up.
With that said.......Kraj....how is the party planning and fatherhood coming along?
Shall I bring the drinks and entertainment?