KenHigg
Registered User
- Local time
- Yesterday, 21:05
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2004
- Messages
- 13,327
Rich said:But they don't see themselves as sleazeballs, desire is often overwhelming
So is your imagination
Rich said:But they don't see themselves as sleazeballs, desire is often overwhelming
Would that be soap suds?KenHigg said:while chugging suds...
Again, this has nothing whatsoever to do with one's sexuality.Rich said:But they don't see themselves as sleazeballs, desire is often overwhelming
Sorry, I wasn't trying to make a dig against you. I was just venting my irritation at the term.cheuschober said:Believe it or not, I think it's a terrible term fraught with supposition, unclarified linguistic ideas, and just plain misleading all as I pointed out earlier. I guess I'm simply more wont to speak on the level society has dictated than to fight to rise above it. 'My bad.'
Kraj said:Sorry, I wasn't trying to make a dig against you. I was just venting my irritation at the term.
Kraj said:Again, this has nothing whatsoever to do with one's sexuality.
Kraj said:An anectode that somewhat relates to the topic, but that I think you'll find interesting:
Recently I was at an event where I overheard a conversation between two men. One began telling the other how "flaming" and feminine gays were an embarassment and weren't even real men. He went on in greater detail but I don't remember every comment. I was instantly put off by such a rude, close-minded, and somewhat offensive commentary.
Then I was told who he was: a homosexual, S&M bondage master who takes photos for a bondage magazine semi-professionally. I'm sure he prefers butch men, but you'd think a person with rather unconventional sexual tastes would have learned to be open minded. How's that for a Freudian Rubic's cube, eh?
*Ahem*Rich said:I never said it was, however one might feel less comfortable having to say it to male member of society, or a masculine member, or even more so to one of those who sit somewhere in between.
How about this?: "I don't care what anybodys sexuality is." <-Period.Rich said:Too true, I don't care what anybodys sexuality is, as long as their not male and have me in their sights
Fair enough.cheuschober said:Truly blind but so transparent I would feign to call him a Rubic's cube.
Kraj said:*Ahem*
How about this?: "I don't care what anybodys sexuality is." <-Period.
Kraj said:My point is why does your original statement have to have the qualifier, "as long they don't hit on me"?
Rich said:Nah, you're just becoming Metrosexual
So why do you label me and Rich as "anti American" despite me keep telling you I'm anti the American warmongering don't-care-about-anybody-else government, and not the American populace?KenHigg said:Seems it's just bad juju to do grouping and labels at all. Don't we have enough division...
Silly question but has anyone in the UK ever heard of the word "metrosexual" before reading it in this thread? I've never heard it before.Groundrush said:For some reason I thought the term "Metrosexual" referred to people that like to have sex in underground Tube Stations....
ColinEssex said:Silly question but has anyone in the UK ever heard of the word "metrosexual" before reading it in this thread? I've never heard it before.
Col
Kraj said:So, because you're straight a gay man is not allowed to hit on you? It's beyond you're ability to deal with? You can't simply say, "No thank you, I'm not interested"?
Meeeeoooow I thought quotes from elsewhere had to have quote marks round themGroundrush said:.......I thought questions usually have question marks at the end
Groundrush said:anyway just googled "Metrosexual" and look what I found.
metrosexual (met.roh.SEK.shoo.ul) n. An urban male with a strong aesthetic sense who spends a great deal of time and money on his appearance and lifestyle.
—metrosexuality n.