In other words he won't engage with anyone who disagrees with his opinion..
No that's not it, he won't engage with people that demonstrate they don't think for themselves.
Let me give you an example of thinking for yourself. I was with a group called Ecademy a precursor to Facebook this was around 2000 think.
The bandwagon at the time everyone was jumping on was indignation at how much bottled water was being drunk.
I thought about it and looked up on the internet how much Coca-Cola was being sold throughout the world.
Turns out it was more than bottled water at that time!
So then I asked them on the forum I said what about Coca-Cola?
What do you mean what about Coke they said...
I said well it's basically a bottle of water with about 5 or 10 spoon Fulls of sugar, some brown colouring and flavouring.
I said in fact I encourage my children to drink bottled water. As opposed to drinking Coca-Cola. A much healthier option for them.
Going back to this climate change being caused by carbon dioxide, I'm thinking the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is or was around 300 parts per million, and it's increased to 400 parts per million, that's 100 parts per million increase. Or in percentage terms is it 0.01% in relation to the whole atmosphere.
That is such an insignificant tiny percentage compared to the volume of the atmosphere, but because it's a 25% increase in the amount of CO2 it's pointed out as being the culprit!
I just can't understand how anyone can suspect that of creating such a major effect on the climate. There has to be something else.
There's a particular graph which I found on Wikipedia which shows the amount of incoming radiation and the amount of outgoing radiation.
It's not a particularly detailed graph but it's obvious that the major element intercepting the energy is water vapour.
The water vapour even catches a percentage of the radiation from the incoming spectrum.
Not a significant amount but if you take into account that it's capturing the energy during the day when the amount of energy available is much higher.
It's clear to me that even a minute increase in the percentage of water vapour, say an increase of 10 percent water vapour, this would have a significant impact on global warming, because there's so much of it.
I have been analysing the energy transmission through the atmosphere graph on and off for a few weeks now, and I have made notes on it and hopefully within a few weeks I will be able to publish it here where everyone will be able to analyse it themselves and draw their own conclusions.
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
