Met Office data integrity
UK Met office in cover up? Wouldn't that increase temperatures!
I asked Grok about it:-
Pls give background on this:- Chris Morrison, the Daily Sceptic's Environment Editor, is astonished by the Met Office's attempt to conceal the fact that many of its 'climate stations' still regularly reporting temperatures closed long ago.
Grok said:-
Chris Morrison serves as the Environment Editor for The Daily Sceptic, a publication known for its skepticism towards mainstream scientific narratives, particularly concerning climate change. His recent astonishment centers around the UK Met Office's handling of its climate data, specifically regarding temperature measurements from what are referred to as 'climate stations.'
Morrison has highlighted concerns that the Met Office has been reporting temperature data from stations that have been closed for years. His investigation suggests that the Met Office has not only continued to publish data from these non-existent stations but has also made efforts to cover up this practice. This issue was brought to light with an article published on December 9, 2024, where Morrison detailed how the Met Office had amended its public data presentations in response to scrutiny but did so in a manner that was not publicly announced, essentially attempting to redefine its methods without acknowledging the previous inaccuracies.
The crux of Morrison's critique involves the integrity of the climate data used by the Met Office. He argues that this practice undermines the reliability of climate data used to support claims about global warming or climate change, especially when these figures are used to advocate for policies like Net Zero emissions. Morrison points out that the Met Office's data, which is often cited with precision down to hundredths of a degree, comes from a network where nearly 80% of the stations are considered 'junk' or 'near junk' by international standards due to their siting and potential for inaccurate readings.
This revelation has stirred significant discussion on social media, with posts on X reflecting a public sentiment of distrust towards the Met Office's data integrity and broader implications for climate science. The controversy adds to a growing narrative questioning the trustworthiness of official climate data and the motivations behind its presentation, particularly in the context of political and environmental policy-making.
The situation Morrison describes, and the subsequent reaction on social media, illustrates a broader debate about data transparency, the accuracy of climate monitoring, and the political implications of climate science. This criticism aligns with Morrison's broader editorial stance at The Daily Sceptic, where he often challenges what he perceives as alarmist or manipulated climate science.
https://dailysceptic.org/2024/12/09...-non-existent-temperature-measuring-stations/
https://dailysceptic.org/author/chris-morrison/
. However, it also allows the government to prevent you from using your own money if they disapprove of your actions. If we allow electronic money, we effectively become slaves.
