Should the civilian population of all countries be disarmed?

So if we reached a certain nember, say 1000 attacks (or insert whatever number you want), with a baseball bat a year then your answer to the problem would be to ban baseball bats?
Hypothetical answer, please provide actual facts to back up your hypothesis
 
Hypothetical answer, please provide actual facts to back up your hypothesis

Can I use my rear view mirrors? :p
 
Why should you be required to take a lesser action to defend yourself.

I can tell you that our place is about the only one in the immediate area that has not been broken into BUT it is very obvious that the house is heavily armed.

Na, they've just seen your db and sh*t themselves........................:p
 
As aside note are you English blokes aware that the most expensive rifles in the world are made in England

Purdey
Holland and Holland
Westley Richards

Can be 100s of 1000s each and a 3 to 5 year wait
 
If the only firearms available cost $100,000, isn't that a form of gun control? :D
 
Why should you be required to take a lesser action to defend yourself.

I can tell you that our place is about the only one in the immediate area that has not been broken into BUT it is very obvious that the house is heavily armed. I must admit that at different times of a night when I hear a noise I have been disappointed that it is not an intruder.

Amen to that, it's pretty bad when you get used to counting the footsteps on the floors above so you know where to aim based on floorboard creeks.

I saw someone mention that people have died from dropping weapons. I chuckled. If a construction worker drops a wrench or hammer, or other tool, off a skyscraper and it kills someone below should we ban those tools? What about someone who slips on a rock hiking? Are slippery rocks or boots now illegal? Should to government inspect you every time you are going to go hiking to make sure you are wearing proper safety equipment?

I also saw the bat argument. A person defending themself should not be required to stop and assess a situation in which they are in immediate danger or in a situation where they perceive themselves to be in immediate danger. If they are capable of stopping and saying "Well, I can see the burglar, he's smaller than me and I don't see any weapons, he isn't going for my kids rooms yet, if I wait a few more minutes I might be able to get by him and grab that bat." Then good on them, they didn't have to take a life. Maybe their are some who could do that, but I'm pretty sure my fiance would freak out were she in that situation, I'd prefer to know she could just grab the shotgun and "point and click" without fear of repurcussions because "criminals have rights".
 
Why is it necessary to attack an intruder?

Why not sit down with them, have a cup of tea and discuss the issue in a civilised manner. It may be that they will see the error of their ways and decide to get a more meaningful job and become an invaluable member of society, and in time a valuable member of society.

Is it necessary to blow their brains out?

Col
 
Yes.

Then you should be allowed to hang their parts from the trees in your lawn to ward off the next ones.

Johnnys in america, low-techs at the
Wheel
No-one needs anyone, they dont even
Just pretend
Johnnys in america

Im afraid of americans
Im afraid of the world
Im afraid I cant help it
Im afraid I cant
Johnnys in america

Johnny wants a brain, johnny wants to
Suck on a coke
Johnny wants a woman, johnny wants
To think of a joke
Johnnys in america

Im afraid of americans
Im afraid of the world
Im afraid I cant help it
Im afraid I cant
Johnnys in america

Johnnys in america, johnny looks up at
The stars
Johnny combs his hair and johnny
Wants pussy and cars
Johnnys in america

Im afraid of americans
Im afraid of the world
Im afraid I cant help it
Im afraid I cant
Johnnys in america

God is an american
Im afraid of americans
Im afraid of the world

Im afraid I cant help it

Im afraid I cant

Im afraid of americans
Im afraid of the words
Im afraid I cant help it
Im afraid I cant
Johnnys in america
Johnnys in america
 
Why is it necessary to attack an intruder?

Why not sit down with them, have a cup of tea and discuss the issue in a civilised manner. It may be that they will see the error of their ways and decide to get a more meaningful job and become an invaluable member of society, and in time a valuable member of society.

Is it necessary to blow their brains out?

Col

Yes.

Because sitting talking to them and you will get a knife stuck in you.
 
Why is it necessary to attack an intruder?

Why not sit down with them, have a cup of tea and discuss the issue in a civilised manner. It may be that they will see the error of their ways and decide to get a more meaningful job and become an invaluable member of society, and in time a valuable member of society.

Is it necessary to blow their brains out?

Col

Is this cup of tea happening before or after the intruder blew your brains out?
While I'm not a big fan of the American concept of a gun in every home, until they wake up and get rid of them totally, there are a necessity in some areas of the US.
The gun genie is out of the bottle in America and in the break in situations described you would be very wise to assume the intruder is armed.
 
I saw someone mention that people have died from dropping weapons. I chuckled. If a construction worker drops a wrench or hammer, or other tool, off a skyscraper and it kills someone below should we ban those tools? What about someone who slips on a rock hiking? Are slippery rocks or boots now illegal? Should to government inspect you every time you are going to go hiking to make sure you are wearing proper safety equipment?
.
You're now clutching at straws, your examples are called accidents, not murder
 
As aside note are you English blokes aware that the most expensive rifles in the world are made in England

Purdey
Holland and Holland
Westley Richards

Can be 100s of 1000s each and a 3 to 5 year wait
The best Purdeys are shot guns and not rifles.
 
Why is it necessary to attack an intruder?

Why not sit down with them, have a cup of tea and discuss the issue in a civilised manner. It may be that they will see the error of their ways and decide to get a more meaningful job and become an invaluable member of society, and in time a valuable member of society.

Is it necessary to blow their brains out?

Col

Quite right Col, Hey I've just seen a whole sty of flying pigs go past my window!

Brian
 
Quite right Col, Hey I've just seen a whole sty of flying pigs go past my window!

Brian

It makes me laugh. These Yanks here think they are so macho - yet I'd bet when push comes to shove, they'd be crapping themselves if they saw an intruder least of all have the guts to shoot a possible unarmed person.

The only person who might kill is Ken, he is a qualified killer of things that breathe.

Col
 
Why is it necessary to attack an intruder?

Why not sit down with them, have a cup of tea and discuss the issue in a civilised manner. It may be that they will see the error of their ways and decide to get a more meaningful job and become an invaluable member of society, and in time a valuable member of society.

Is it necessary to blow their brains out?

Col


Kind of reminds me of this
 
The best Purdeys are shot guns and not rifles.

Originally was that way.

A Purdey double rifle has a little more pizzaz than the H&H with Westley Richards a distant third.
 
You're now clutching at straws, your examples are called accidents, not murder


Accidently dropping your gun and it killing someone is also called an accident. Thank you for conceding that point.
 
Accidently dropping your gun and it killing someone is also called an accident. Thank you for conceding that point.
Now back up your theory with facts, guns are designed to KILL, building tools are not
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom