Isaac
Lifelong Learner
- Local time
- Yesterday, 18:06
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2017
- Messages
- 10,839
Can't disagree with that.When Fox feels the need to censor the name George Soros that's a bad omen.
Can't disagree with that.When Fox feels the need to censor the name George Soros that's a bad omen.
You guys need a new boogeyman.When Fox feels the need to censor the name George Soros that's a bad omen.
Nah, he serves a purpose for now.You guys need a new boogeyman.
In a list of interview highlights released before the special, Holt asked Bourla, “Even though I’ve had the protection, am I still able to transmit it to other people?”
“I think this is something that needs to be examined. We are not certain about that right now with what we know,” Bourla responded.
I agree with you. That is my feeling too. Although I would change that to don't let them have it!People who don't want it - well, that's their decision. Let them have it.
With the v, my vaccine protects me. Period.
I've read that it definitely is likely to cause some unpleasantness in the next 24 hrs or so. But nothing that approaches damage or risk to life or livelihood, so to speak. Like the real thing can.I agree with you. That is my feeling too. Although I would change that to don't let them have it!
I'm not sure how ill I will feel when taking the vaccine, because there is some talk that it can give unpleasant symptoms as your body kicks in its defence. But I am not sure how common or rare that is. Anyone know?
Of course I do know what you mean....I am just thinking, there are so many people who don't want to get it, we might as well boil the whole thing down to the abstract: What is really 'bad' about this virus? It hurts or kills people. But what is bad about that? Only if they don't want that to happen to them. Ultimately the badness of the virus--and consequently, the goodness of the vaccine--is only "good" from each person's perspective, what it can do for them. True, my vaccine might prevent Uncle Joe from getting the virus.............But, since Uncle Joe has something available to him that would probably protect him, bar none--and he refuses to get it, and in order to make people not feel forced to get it, we might as well boil it all down to: If only 60% of people want it, that's fine with me. The 40% who were totally OK risking getting COVID, it's hard to feel sympathy for so my goal becomes--as long as each person who wants it gets it Fauci might as well be happyWell, you having the vaccine protects others that may have been infected by you if you got the virus. So it protects you directly, others indirectly. I agree with it being a personal decision though.
Dr. Saphire was a participant. She blurted-out (paraphrased): "Look!!!!! I can find a "scientific study" to support whatever narrative you are hyping".
I hope that does not become the case. The proof, I mean.So your thinking You will have a choice?if you want to fly, enter a government building or school you will need proof of vaccination. Which begs the question is your documents real or forged.