Trump Indictment

[Isaac]

I'm waiting sadly for 50 people to do something stupid around the Trump Indictment courthouse so we can endlessly hear a Big Lie about April 6th (or whatever) as opposed to January 6th.

Meanwhile, 50 other people - people who have actually hurt, maimed, stabbed, shot, robbed someone - will be walking OUT of the same jail after no-bail or downgraded charges or declined charges, because "It's equity, dude!" or "They were wrong, but I understand why they are angry and hurting", etc.

To quote libbish media, "Watch this space"

 

[ebs17]

The alternative truth is already pre-composed. Now it needs a few fragments of real events.
Don't worry: There are always crazy people...

 

[Isaac]

Don't worry: There are always crazy people...

True, but neither of us should pre-order a batch of Scarlet Letters just yet: "crazy" is re-defined every month.

I can imagine a headline from CNN in 2050: "Mental disorders have been reduced to zero percent in America" ...

 

[AccessBlaster]

Don't worry: There are always crazy people...

Or the FBI posing as crazy white supremacist Trump supporters in order to drive the narrative that "Trump and his lunatic fringe supporters" are dangerous insurgents and can't be allowed to ever hold office again!

It's not like it hasn't already happened in the recent past.

 

[Steve R.]

Based on media reporting, it appears that the basis for Bragg's indictment is mischaracterization of the payment made to Stormy Daniels as a "legal expense". Identifying the payment as a "legal expense" seems legitimate as part of the overall legal process in preparing and executing the Non-Disclosure agreement.

Additionally, many have also raised the very legitimate points that there is no victim. The implication here is: What is the point of prosecuting?

 

[Isaac]

Based on media reporting, it appears that the basis for Bragg's indictment is mischaracterization of the payment made to Stormy Daniels as a "legal expense". Identifying the payment as a "legal expense" seems legitimate as part of the overall legal process in preparing and executing the Non-Disclosure agreement.

Additionally, many have also raised the very legitimate points that there is no victim. The implication here is: What is the point of prosecuting?

Kind of makes you realize, doesn't it? The fact that a few days ago when the liberals were all criticizing conservatives for calling it a bookkeeping error as if that were some kind of insane trivialization, NO. It was actually the most TRUTHFUL way to say it...

 

[AccessBlaster]

I thought liberals wanted government out of the bedroom

 

[Isaac]

I thought liberals wanted government out of the bedroom

Only in the case of a few privileged beneficiaries, like everything else libs are going after.

 

[Isaac]

Speaking of bedrooms, liberal media is basically having an right now. Really crazy stuff on the news!

 

[AccessBlaster]

Trump has a gag order but the grand jury is free to leak to CNN

 

[Isaac]

Can someone please re-find the video Tera originally posted that shows the 1-2 dozen times Biden has engaged in his sidling-up, hair sniffing behavior towards girls between 5 and 15? Post it again in case people have forgotten about reality of who they elected.
The worst part is this appalled look you see on the parents faces.

But of course, "we have no idea where Qanon gets its theories!"

Umm-hmmm.

 

[Steve R.]

WH quietly corrects Jean-Pierre's claim Biden has taken more press questions than Trump, Obama, Bush combined

The White House has quietly corrected a claim by press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre that President Biden has taken more questions than his three most recent predecessors combined.

www.foxnews.com

The irony. Bragg claimed that Trump falsified a business record so he issued an arrest warrant. Now we have the White House falsifying an official transcript to hide lies. Where is the arrest warrant?

 

[ChrisH81]

Being from the UK I feel its no better here lol.

 

[Steve R.]

Public pessimism on the economy hits a new high, CNBC survey shows

A record 69% of the public holds negative views about the economy both now and in the future.

www.cnbc.com

Surprising to CNBC actually reporting negative news concerning Biden. But that is not the reason for posting. This report references the Trump Indictment at the 1.55 minute mark of the embedded video.

How Does the Trump's Indictment Influence Your Vote?

• 14% More likely
• 25% Less likely

Is it a Good Thing or A Bad Thing that a President was Indicted?

• 53% Responded that it was a good thing as no one is above the law.
• 37% Responded that it was an obvious political hit job.

The results are depressing from the perspective that the Democrats know how to "sell" a story to manipulate the public. In their messaging, Democrats ignore facts and the rule-of-law. For Democrats, the ends justify the means, they will "sell" a story even when its false. Democrats have no ethics. Democrats are the threat to democracy.

 

[Steve R.]

 

[conception_native_0123]

could someone answer something for me please.........how is it that Trump is still able to run for office in 2024 and is now campaigning if he has officially been indicted? I saw something in the paper today about other republicans urging voters to dump the Trump machine for other ideas.

 

[AngelSpeaks]

could someone answer something for me please.........how is it that Trump is still able to run for office in 2024 and is now campaigning if he has officially been indicted? I saw something in the paper today about other republicans urging voters to dump the Trump machine for other ideas.

Innocent until proven guilty.

 

[Steve R.]

could someone answer something for me please.........how is it that Trump is still able to run for office in 2024 and is now campaigning if he has officially been indicted? I saw something in the paper today about other republicans urging voters to dump the Trump machine for other ideas.

As @AngelSpeaks said: "Innocent until proven guilty", but I also refer you to my Post #7. There you will see that the purpose of the so-called indictment was to manipulate public perception. This so-called indictment is nothing more than a blatant third-world style political hit job. Bragg has made a mockery of the rule-of-law. This is a prime example of Beria's: "Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime" in action.

 

[ColinEssex]

As I said elsewhere, it matters not if he is guilty or innocent. We know money talks, American politics is so corrupt, he will be found not guilty and will be president in 2024.
Col

 

[conception_native_0123]

will be president in 2024.

oh bullshit. you're jumping the gun there buddy.