ColinEssex said:
The child benefit is currently £18 per week until the child is (I think) 18 years old.
Based on Ken's calculations, it isn't all that much, but hey - anything extra is good. It wouldn't keep me from working, but boy, that would be lovely. And to answer your question, no, the US government doesn't give that kind of an allowance.
ColinEssex said:
Maternity benefit is paid if you have been employed by the same employer for 26 weeks (6 months). You get 90% of your weekly earnings for a period of 26 weeks, then it reduces after the 6 months. It can be paid as soon as week 15 of the pregnancy. Its paid by the employer.
If you are less then 26 weeks employed by the same employer, you get Maternity allowance - which is paid by the government.
Holy crap!!! No wonder woman stay out so long!! Although it varies from employer to employer, the standard is 6-8 weeks full pay for maternity benefits. However, at my last employer, which was a University, since I had worked there for 7 years, if I had had the baby while I was still employed with them, I would have been eligible for 26 weeks full pay. I would never have taken that much though. Over here, no one else does your work for you while you are out - it just piles up...
ColinEssex said:
Fair enough, but there was a programme on the telly a while back which compared child care in the 50's and 60's with todays shambles.
They realised that in the 50's and 60's, mothers usually stayed home to raise the family. This led to a continuity of care and education.
These days kids get pushed from playschool to childminder / school / relatives / the father (who is separated) and the kids are more screwed up.
How about this for an idea - Mothers should stay at home and look after the kids - thats their job isn't it? its only this equality rubbish that gives them the delusion that they can do it all. A mothers job is to raise children isn't it?
Ok, here's my dispute on that program - there are only a million reasons why kids are screwed up. In the 50s and 60s, the evidence of divorce was much lower as well, and I believe that to be a much higher contributing factor than daycare. As such, moms can't very well stay home with the kids if they have to support the family.
Personally, I would LOVE to be able to stay home and watch the baby all day. We would have so much FUN!!! But since I am the primary breadwinner in the family, and will probably continue to be, there isn't a chance of that happening.
I also truly think she enjoys being around all of the other people and kids, and if she was home with me alone, I think she would be bored. Plus she wouldn't be getting only limited socialization until she went to school, and then how screwed up would she be? Like I said, I'm doing the best I can, and I think most mothers do that every day. And worry that they don't do enough.
Lisa