No offence taken
How does US medical insurance work? Let's say you never got sick - hypothetically, you paid for 50 years, then died in a plane crash - would they give you your money back? I'm guessing not, but I'm prepared to learn differently. The money you pay is going to help fund the treatment of people who
do get ill, correct? These people have also paid contributions to the insurance company.
The only difference I see is that in a system such as exists in the UK surplus contributions from one person may help people who
can't afford to help themselves. In the US, surplus money either goes to help people who don't need help, as they're already looking after themselves, or it gets turned directly into profits for the insurance company.
Would you rather that money you're already spending go to the needy or to a large corporation?
Also, isn't a society judged partly by how well it treats it's weakest members? If the poor are allowed to become sick and die off purely because they
are poor (for whatever reason), that doesn't make the parent society look too good. Yes, some people make no effort to help themselves, but I can't believe that's the reason in the majority of cases where people have no medical cover.
What gives the well-off people in a country the right to say that physically or mentally disabled people should be allowed to die because they're indistinguishable from the layabouts?
What if insurance premiums quadrupled or worse? Could you still afford to pay them? You've worked hard (presumably

) and contributed for years to something you'd then get no benefit from when you most needed it. Compared to people better off than yourself, and through no fault of your own, you'd then be 'poor' and unable to look after yourself. Should you be left to rot because those who
can stil afford it think you should?