Here is something to ponder on regarding human reproduction in order to show where God’s creation matches God’s word.
This is exactly what I was talking about. You see science through a cloud of prejudices that hold Islam as "the TRUTH". Only someone completely enamoured by their religion could draw the conclusion that your tenuous comparison shows the agreement between science and the Quran.
You would appear to be claiming that "mingled sperm" shows prior knowledge that the semen is produced from multiple organs.
Verily, We created man from a drop of mingled sperm (nutfahtin amchaj) …
Qur’an – Insan (Man) 76:2
· The seminal fluid, comprising of a mixture of four different liquids, travels from the male urinary tract to the female reproductive system.
The the reference to "a drop of " supposed to show knowledge that only one sperm does the fertilisation?
·Once the egg enters into the egg, the fertilised egg goes into ‘lock down’ i.e. the single spermatozoa inside the egg cannot escape and no new spermatozoa can enter.
·Over two weeks, the fertilised egg becomes a clot.
·Thereafter, the clot travels down the fallopian tube and implants itself to the wall of the uterus. This is referred to as ‘implantation’.
You claim the parallel of science and the Quran by substituting the words of the Quran into the science without any rational justification.
The blastocyst is not a "clot".
The levels of a pregnancy hormone (Human Chorionic Gonadotropin - HCG) increases which indicates that ‘implantation’ has occurred through a urine or blood test.
What has this to do with your "proof". Does the Quran mention HCG anywhere?
Then you connect the 23 pairs of chromosomes with the 23 "mentions of man and woman" in the Quran. That is drawing a very long bow. And the mention of pairs is supposed to refer to chromosomes? This is patently ridiculous.
· Both men and woman have 23 pairs of chromosomes in each cell.
· Twenty two of these chromosome pairs (autosomes) are identical in both men and women.
The number of times the words man and woman occurs in the Qur'an is 23.
45. That He did create in pairs, male and female,
So now man is made of an extract of clay?12. And [We] created man from an extract of clay (tiyn).
Now it gets really bizarre.
13. Moreover We placed him as a drop (nutfah) in a safe lodging.
14. Then We created the drop (nutfah) into a clinging clot (alaqah), and created the clinging clot (alaqah) into a lump of chewed flesh (mudrat), and created the chewed flesh (mudrat) into bones ('idham) and clothed the bones ('idham) with intact flesh (lahm);
This is certainly not the process by humans got here. If it is still supposed to represent gestation then it is wrong there too. The bones do not form before the organs and "intact flesh".
At no point does "chewed flesh" provide a reasonable representation of the embryonic development.
Now man is made from a drop of sperm, not clay after all? Indeed the Quran says man is made of sperm, water, clay and dust in various different verses.46. From a sperm (nutfah) drop when it is emitted.
Qur’an 53:45-46
It is perfectly obvious that, like the Jewish and Christian Holy Books, the Quran is nothing more than the musings of an ancient person who, like all "prophets", presumed his own prejudices were seeded by supernatural wisdom.