An opinion. You can close your eyes as the Germans did in the 30's. A crime (actually many) was committed and so far no judge has been willing to allow discovery because they KNOW what the audit will find.
@moke123, The lawsuit targeted the four specific states because those are the states where the crime is known to have occurred. It may have and probably did occur in others. But in those four states we start with the obvious collusion. Maybe someone should have asked for phone records to see who was making the decision to pull the plug on counting. Those are the states that TOGETHER decided to stop counting ballots on election night when Trump was well ahead. Ask yourself WHY. WHEN in the history of our elections has something like this ever happened before? Four states that are most in contention simply stop counting at 10:30 at night when your guy is behind? Just ask that ONE question given that you know so much about the law and crime. Give us a plausible reason why FOUR states which were ultimately going to decide the outcome of the election just stopped counting!!!!! Given the timing, collusion was obvious so please include that in your explanation.
We know for a fact that elections have been meddled with over the years. For some reason, the dead people demographic seems to vote for Democrats
In the past it has always been local elections so the crimes don't rise to treason and the actual number of ballots that need to be manipulated is only a few hundred to swing a close election. But here we have people who are known to run sloppy elections doing suspicious things like refusing access to election monitors and changing laws at the last minute to reduce the already weak guardrails that are supposed to prevent meddling. You are sufficiently technically competent, unlike members of Congress, to understand how this crime was perpetrated and that it is quite possible to manufacture out of thin air hundreds of thousands of ballots. Any one of us could do it without breaking a sweat The Democrats have the motive and the means to pull this off. Biden simply could not win on his own. The Dems mis-calculated and that's why they had to shut down the counting. They needed to come up with way more ballots than they had planned on to overcome Trump's lead and they needed time to do that. They also needed the privacy to run the counterfeit ballots through the tabulating machines multiple times. If ANY judge had allowed discovery, an audit would have turned up these anomalies. That's why they needed a blue wall and they got it. The three justices appointed by Trump are so shell-shocked by their treatment in the media that they would violate their oath to protect the Constitution rather than to seem to favor Trump in a decision.
Two very simple things need to be done before the next election.
1. EVERY ballot whether in-person or mail-in must be barcoded with a unique identifier and the counting software must reject duplicate ballots.
2. Accurate counts must be kept and published ahead of time so they can't be changed after the fact as they were in Pennsylvania. Someone needs to get a count from the PO. Of course with no judge allowing discovery, that will not happen. We need to know EXACTLY how many ballots were printed and what their number range is. We also need to know how many ballots were mailed out including that range also (the PO must confirm the number). And we need to know how many ballots were received at each counting site. ALL of this needs to balance. And obviously the closer to a 100% return rate, the more suspicious the numbers. The counting centers ALWAYS need to know the maximum number of ballots that they will receive. How hard is that?
Just FYI, except for Lou Dobbs who is on Fox's Business channel, the rest of the talking heads towed the party line, which was Biden won. It has only been the last week or so that Tucker has begun to believe that the ballot stuffing actually happened.