I'm in Love with ChatGPT

Another excellent video from Wes on large language models. In this one he discusses Move 37, begs the Question what was move 42?

 
Last edited:
Brilliant video from Andrej Karpathy. A three-hour deep dive into large language models:-

 
Last edited:
If you like your AI stuff, I've been watching the following podcaster. There is a caveat though. It is an avatar of a podcaster. However, I didn't realise that until much later on! The realism is so great that it is very hard to tell most of the time. She also talks about someone using ChatGPT to get answers for cancer treatment that was costing them over $100K through the usual medical route.

 
I'm predicting the next money making wave after watching that AI generated video! An only fans AI!! An AI that will cater for anyone's needs!!!
I never understood the "only fans" phenom, I understand AI generated only fans even less. Who pays for this? I mean isn't every conceivable fetish already available online for free?
 
the way ChatGPT 'writes' its answers in a sort of "live, as-you-go" way has me pondering.

do you think they did that because it looks cool and/or because of the way it makes you Feel , instead of any real need for it?

if so I wonder if that's the best approach. it can take too much time when you're getting a long response, and I think they probably did it based on it looks cool.

I have to confess, I once created some Excel automation for someone with a long Log of what the outcome was. Instead of writing it to a text file, I saved the outcome in a string variable and then used Sendkeys in Notepad. It had a "wave" visual effect that I liked and for no other reason. It was a small temporary project and I was just having fun. I think ChatGPT is too. Surely the answers don't come slowly to it like that internally.?
 
AI Failing Coders?
I completely disagree. The rate of improvement in the AI's coding is dramatic. Sam Altman says he predicts AI will be the best coder by the end of this year. Their internal model is already ranked about 100th in the world on coding benchmarks. My belief is that people are just completely underestimating what is going to happen, probably due to wishful thinking.

AI is making coders far more productive. So if that is the case, you need less coders to do the same amount of work. It's not rocket science. The better AI gets at coding, the less coders you need, until you hardly need any. It is ironic that coders are designing systems that will lead to their own downfall.
 
probably due to wishful thinking
People are against AI, just because they can't accept the changes. Those who know what's going on, know for sure how tomorrow will be.


482794633_18501676009030160_3294171985429323931_n.jpeg


482341046_18501676018030160_3728522420081118277_n.jpeg



 
  • Like
Reactions: Jon
I agree, but I think there will be plenty of zig-zagging along the way from failure to understand the human element involved in AI, from accidents where AI 's output is degraded, and people hurrying to trust something they don't understand. It will be a 2 steps forward 1 step backward kind of evolution with plenty of potholes along the road.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom