dan-cat
Registered User.
- Local time
- Today, 06:57
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2002
- Messages
- 3,433
If a woman wants an abortion, that means she does not want to have the baby, clearly we can all agree on that, yes? So the next question is, who should be able to make the decision if she is allowed to terminate that pregnancy? Who makes the decision that she must carry a pregnancy for 9 months?
I'll just address this point.
The reason for law is to uphold a standard of our notion of ethics.
It cannot be left to the individual because then selfish reasons would tend to override this standard and ethics would quickly be dispensed with.
In this case, the way our rationale works, the potentiality of things, makes up a significant part of the way we think. Law is there to take into account of this fact as well as the rights of the mother. Law tries to uphold the rights of the individual but also protect the very method of how we come to conclude what is right and what is wrong. Roe vs Wade attempted to balance these two points.
Sometime ago I asked a question to someone here, I can't remember who, that I never got a question to.
If a woman continually becomes pregnant and continually has an abortion. Is this irresponsible? If so, what is the incremental factor that eventually tips x number of abortions into irresponsibility?