jsanders
If I Only had a Brain
- Local time
- Today, 03:51
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2005
- Messages
- 1,940
Kraj said:The numbers are just estimates, of course, .
So it could be off by, say, 3 orders of magnitude?
Kraj said:The numbers are just estimates, of course, .
I really have no idea what the actual variance is.jsanders said:So it could be off by, say, 3 orders of magnitude?
Dr Simon Driver said the number was drawn up based on a survey of one strip of sky, rather than trying to count every individual star.
The team used two of the world's most powerful telescopes, one at the Anglo-Australian Observatory in northern New South Wales state and one in the Canary Islands, to carry out their survey.
Within the strip of sky some 10,000 galaxies were pinpointed and detailed measurements of their brightness taken to calculate how many stars they contained.
That number was then multiplied by the number of similar sized strips needed to cover the entire sky, Driver said, and then multiplied again out to the edge of the visible universe.
Kraj said:I really have no idea what the actual variance is.
I just realized I answered the wrong question about stars. Here's a link that explains a bit more detail:
I'm sorry if I was unclear...I was saying the number of atoms in the average human body is 100,000 times greater than the number of stars in the known universe, not the number of atoms in a star (which, for an average star, happens to be pretty close to the square of the number of atoms in the average human body).msp said:Yes I would of been very suprised if there were more atoms in a human than in a star...
Kraj said:I'm sorry if I was unclear...I was saying the number of atoms in the average human body is 100,000 times greater than the number of stars in the known universe, not the number of atoms in a star (which, for an average star, happens to be pretty close to the square of the number of atoms in the average human body).
It breaks down like this:
# of stars in the known universe: 7x10^22
# of atoms in the average human body: 7x10^27
# of atoms in an average-size star: 1x10^57
jsanders said:Are you on Drugs?
jsanders said:A star is usually made of hydrogen compressed to the point of fusion and a human is about a gazillion times smaller.
No.jsanders said:Are you on Drugs?
Because when you're dealing with numbers as huge as counting atoms, squaring them produces unbelieveably huge numbers.jsanders said:How in any universe could a star only contain the square of the number of atoms as a human?
Kraj said:No.
Because when you're dealing with numbers as huge as counting atoms, squaring them produces unbelieveably huge numbers.
7x10^27^2 = 7x10^54
That's close enough to 1x10^57 for my statement to be acceptably accurate. And to be precise, a star is not a gazillion times bigger than a human, it's approx. 10^30 times bigger, or 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times bigger. Or you could say if an average person weighs 150 pounds, then an average star weighs about 150 trillion trillion pounds.
Well, number of atoms is quite different than volume. I'd have to look up the sun's radius to determine that number, but considering the sun's radius is 100 times the Earth's, you're probably pretty close.jsanders said:Anyway according to your calculations the sun's volume has space for as many humans, as we have for atoms.
I'm not sure what you mean. (Salt water isn't a very good constant, by the way.)jsanders said:Have you run the numbers using a constant like salt water just to see if it is in the same order?
Rich said:After the Civil War the U.S. sued Great Britain for damages that were caused by them building ships for the Confederacy
I did NOT need to know that.The average human eats 8 spiders in their lifetime at night.
TessB said:I did NOT need to know that.
FoFa said:The rootkit of all evil: As if foisting Mariah Carey on us wasn’t bad enough; Sony BMG Music Entertainment has been caught installing a rootkit -- a tool typically used by malware. If you play a copy-protected Sony CD on your PC, it installs a digital rights management scheme you can neither detect nor remove. After security wonks revealed the rootkit could be used to compromise systems merely by appending the prefix “$sys$” to the name of any rogue program, Sony and software partner First 4 Internet issued a steady stream of denials, along with a patch that removes the rootkit. Everybody in the music biz wants to be a gangsta, but Sony seems to be taking those dreams literally.
It’s only grok ’n’ roll: File-swapping network Grokster has closed its doors and agreed to pay $50 million in damages to the record companies (although, given Grokster’s subzero bank account, the companies may have to accept payment in Monopoly money). So, to recap: Making it possible for consumers to illegally swap music is very bad. Making it possible for hackers to illegally hijack your computer, however, is just an average day in the record business.
Put your mind at ease, it's not true.TessB said:I did NOT need to know that.
In a 1993 PC Professional article, columnist Lisa Holst wrote about the ubiquitous lists of "facts" that were circulating via e-mail and how readily they were accepted as truthful by gullible recipients. To demonstrate her point, Holst offered her own made-up list of equally ridiculous "facts," among which was the statistic cited above about the average person's swallowing eight spiders per year, which she took from a collection of common misbeliefs printed in a 1954 book on insect folklore. In a delicious irony, Holst's propagation of this false "fact" has spurred it into becoming one of the most widely-circulated bits of misinformation to be found on the Internet.