Are you an atheist? (9 Viewers)

Are you an atheist?


  • Total voters
    351
Love makes good people do bad things. Shall we prohibit that too?
Lets keep calm guys. All I ask for is the freedom not to believe in what I consider to be a fairy story - Father Christmas seems a better bet if I have to believe in something. :D However I feel the same freedom should be extended to everyone to believe what they feel is true but they should not be allowed to force their views on other people. Organised religions(or Love) should not be banned but they should not be allowed to preach hatred and encourage people to be violent to other people.

I suspect that the problem with organised religions is that they are primarily human organisations and have all the faults of human organisations.
 
Science can only describe/explain phenomena that exist within the limitations of space and time. Beyond those limits, science cannot go except in speculation. That's reality, as I see it. If you disagree then fine. Show me where I'm wrong. My rationale: God, if he exists, created space and time. He isn't limited by them. Science can NEVER get a handle on God. He's beyond the scope of our very existence. He's not some clever fellow playing harps on a cloud who we can send a plane up to photograph; he's not some cowardly alien 'hiding' behind Alpha Centauri; he's GOD.

Yes. It is the hubris(:p) of the human mind to think that this concept can be totally hammered into our frame of perception.

The requested evidence can only be perceived if you enter the mind of God. We are far below the required standard but hold delusions of grandeur because of our ability to be aware of ourselves and thus question our own held place in space and time.

This ability to question is no evidence that we hold the capacity to know all.
 
Yes. It is the hubris(:p) of the human mind to think that this concept can be totally hammered into our frame of perception.

The requested evidence can only be perceived if you enter the mind of God. We are far below the required standard but hold delusions of grandeur because of our ability to be aware of ourselves and thus question our own held place in space and time.

This ability to question is no evidence that we hold the capacity to know all.
Evidence for what:confused: If it is evidence for the existence of God then surely you are begging the question if you have to enter his mind to see the evidence.

This thread has been interesting but inconclusive. I doubt if anyone has changed their position as a result of it. Posts like 253 from Pauldohert are impossible to refute without being disrespectful of him and so do little to advance the debate.
 
Evidence for what:confused: If it is evidence for the existence of God then surely you are begging the question if you have to enter his mind to see the evidence.

It is not my position to require evidence of God to justify the possibility of it. That is the thread starters. My position is, is that it is incorrect to deny the possibility of a thing that by definition is beyond your scope of comprehension.

This thread has been interesting but inconclusive.

I would like to think that Dawkins suggested correlation between spirituality and lack of intelligence can now be taken with a pinch of salt. :p
 
As a complete aside - at my local church, there was a monk/priest - I can't remember which, who fell in the garden of the monastery(old priest/monk home) and died, this was announced at mass.

What they didn't tell us was, that he thought he was Jesus and could fly, he fell in the garden from the 3 floor.

True:)
 
This thread has been interesting but inconclusive. I doubt if anyone has changed their position as a result of it. Posts like 253 from Pauldohert are impossible to refute without being disrespectful of him and so do little to advance the debate.

I Think Paul justs wants to be the last poster.

I agree with your sentiments about the thread, as one who has not studied all the literature mentioned I found it interesting but feel that there is a fundamental flaw to some of the arguments.

There will never be any prove of a God unless He shows Himself, however no matter what science shows or proves will not disprove the possibility of a God as the hand of a God may still be behind the big bang, evolution or whatever, infact it will never be possible to disprove the existence of a God, but I like everybody else do not know if one or more exist, or it is just a fantasy or hope born out of Faith, frustration ,desperation or just a need.

Brian
 
What they didn't tell us was, that he thought he was Jesus and could fly, he fell in the garden from the 3 floor.

True:)

I guess in his delusional state he forgot the teachings of the gospel. Matthew Chapter 4.
 
I guess in his delusional state he forgot the teachings of the gospel. Matthew Chapter 4.

Not knowing what they are I shall take your word for it.
 
I agree with your sentiments about the thread, as one who has not studied all the literature mentioned I found it interesting but feel that there is a fundamental flaw to some of the arguments.

I for one have really enjoyed it. :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom