Brianwarnock
Retired
- Local time
- Today, 04:49
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2003
- Messages
- 12,701
Col beat me to the reply.
Brian
Brian
Brianwarnock said:No, I think that it was just a general comment this time, I doubt that col had remembered what had passed in the other thread, that would require that he takes things seriously
Brian
KenHigg said:Come on Brian, I doubt he'd remember and bring up the phrase 'Horses Ass' unless he had specific intent. Aren't you just trying to help him out because you guys are buddies outside the forum? Can you use your detective skills to uncover his true motive for the gutter remarks?
Brian is in Liverpool, thats about 300 miles away from EssexKenHigg said:Aren't you just trying to help him out because you guys are buddies outside the forum?
Brianwarnock said:I have no contact with col outside the forum , tho' I think that he would be an intereesting bloke to have a drink with, however he lives at the other end of the country.
I wasn't taking sides, I was genuinly puzzelled(sp), and my last comment was a bit flippant, but obviously failed to lighten the mood.
Brian
That's virtually next-door neighbours in the US Col. You know petrol at 30p per gallon....ColinEssex said:Brian is in Liverpool, thats about 300 miles away from Essex
Col
KenHigg said:So you think my responses to his original gutter remark were a bit skewed?
They'd have called out the national guard to invade, I mean look what George did to Saddam for calling his daddy namesColinEssex said:. . . . . just imagine if I had directed a remark specifically at Ken or Kraj or another of our American colleagues. . . . . .
Col
Is that the same as the ROTC? the pretend soldiers we spoke of last week?Rich said:They'd have called out the national guard to invade,
That's the Utah branchColinEssex said:Is that the same as the ROTC? the pretend soldiers we spoke of last week?
Col
Brianwarnock said:I think that you may have read more into them than was intended, if that is equal to skewed then yes. The problem with the forum is there is no body language to help us out in understanding, interpreting,etc,comments.
Brian
KenHigg said:Sorry Brian, I still say Cols comments were directed at me. If not, then he should have no problem apologizing and clarifying what he meant to say...
Now just let me check this - you want me to apologise to you because I said an everyday remark that did not mention you by name or any of your family, that you assumed was directed at you? - er, won't that mean I have to apologise to 300million US people too because I didn't direct the remark at them either? on-yer-bike matey!KenHigg said:Sorry Brian, I still say Cols comments were directed at me. If not, then he should have no problem apologizing
I refer you to the comment I made earlierKenHigg said:and clarifying what he meant to say...
I find it incredible that an everyday (UK) phrase innocently said about no-one in particular can cause such a stir
ColinEssex said:Now just let me check this - you want me to apologise to you because I said an everyday remark that did not mention you by name or any of your family, that you assumed was directed at you? - er, won't that mean I have to apologise to 300million US people too because I didn't direct the remark at them either? on-yer-bike matey!
I refer you to the comment I made earlier
Col
reclusivemonkey said:Too... much... bait...
Tell me Ken, which part of "innocently said about no-one in particular" is it you're having difficulty with.KenHigg said:So who was it directed at?
ColinEssex said:Tell me Ken, which part of "innocently said about no-one in particular" is it you're having difficulty with.
Col