@MajP
Thanks for sharing your dataset for testing.
You have made a very educational demo. I don't know how much of the existing code is a part of the tree view examples, but it seems like a challenge to try to evaluate right now. I did make tests with the three versions.
Light recursive load was fast as advertised. It only builds the necessary nodes to begin and that is reasonable. Full recursive load and full non-recursive load were slow, I don't know which one is slower because I did not check the times, but the two froze Access. I was not able to reproduce the crash, though.
Once I get some free time, I will try to load only the initial nodes to see how it performs.
Thanks for sharing your dataset for testing.
You have made a very educational demo. I don't know how much of the existing code is a part of the tree view examples, but it seems like a challenge to try to evaluate right now. I did make tests with the three versions.
Light recursive load was fast as advertised. It only builds the necessary nodes to begin and that is reasonable. Full recursive load and full non-recursive load were slow, I don't know which one is slower because I did not check the times, but the two froze Access. I was not able to reproduce the crash, though.
Once I get some free time, I will try to load only the initial nodes to see how it performs.