...will now be branded anti-American
Er, that wouldn't require branding, it's kinda obvious. If I personally had to label you it would be as a troll, smacktard and fool, though I don't really go for labelling. But I digress.
...will now be branded anti-American
Er, that wouldn't require branding, it's kinda obvious. If I personally had to label you it would be as a troll, smacktard and fool, though I don't really go for labelling. But I digress.
But then you have proven, time and again, to be "a supernatural creature of Scandinavian folklore, variously portrayed as a friendly or mischievous dwarf or as a giant, that lives in caves, in the hills, or under bridges". So at least he got that bit right.Fool usually means stupid doesn't it?
But then you have proven, time and again, to be "a supernatural creature of Scandinavian folklore, variously portrayed as a friendly or mischievous dwarf or as a giant, that lives in caves, in the hills, or under bridges". So at least he got that bit right.
Once again, we have the 'would have been'. Is it just me or does no-one else see how foolish it is to confidently state what would have taken place if...?
You have just said "Not every civilian ", meaning that some do. How the hell do you know for a fact that none of those who would have gone to water (as you put it) would have made the situation worse?
I'm not saying that they couldn't have helped, just trying to get the gun crowd to admit that they might not have.
By the same argument, if I'd been there I would have stopped it, since I'd have know to be standing behind the gunman and would have had the foresight to bring a baseball bat. Some may argue that this wouldn't have happened, but I can just as confidently state it to be 'true'.
Does that make me stupid though?
as for the possibility that another armed person in that situation might have made it worse, of course I can't prove it, I guess it boils down to my personal belief when I say that....... If you can't repsect that then I think we'll just have to agree to disagree.
Until someone slipped a few through a border and started using guns on the unarmed populace.
.
You'll get no disagreement from me - that was exactly the point I was making.
Have a good one.
I agree, we don't know what would have happened.
As long as there is a movement to turn kids into sheep, we'll continue to watch them get sheared.
.
Start confiscating guns from Iraq & Iran.
So those who advocate gun control are sheep
What problem does Iran have with guns
Where do you think the Iraqi insurgents are getting their guns?
Isn't Mexico usually blamed?US army surplus stores, US gun fairs
Isn't Mexico usually blamed?
US army surplus stores, US gun fairs
Don't you mean Cheney?...The guys who go to gun fairs tend to want to shoot first and ask questions later. Oh, wait... maybe THAT'S where GWB goes for relaxation?
In the words of your distinguished collegue:
Since everything Col speaks is truth and he is never wrong, the gunman was undeniably a Korean.
You're quite welcomeNice of you to say so - If the chap was born in Korea, he's Korean. It's simple really. Bob Hope is English, as is Chaplin whats the problem?
Three killed in Idaho shootings
Three people have been killed and two wounded in a sniper attack in the town of Moscow, Idaho.
The sniper sprayed a county courthouse with bullets, killing a police officer and wounding two people.
The gunman then hid in a church for several hours before police stormed the building and found his body and that of another man.
Police do not know the shooter's motive and do not believe he had a specific target in mind.