When does the winning srart?

[Isaac]

I agree.

Not to sound too much like those tiresome celebrities who always threaten to leave the US, but if the Democrats win the presidency in 2024 I'm going to be sorely disappointed. Not because Trump is so great, but because his policies are the common sense policies we need to even make America average again, and possibly great.

My record backs me up - I've researched the possibility of living abroad for a year or two and working remotely several times, most recently it's not working out b/c my employer's client contracts preclude anyone from accessing confidential data outside the US.
If not for that, I'd have been on the shores of Costa Rica a long time ago.

 

[Isaac]

@jpl458 I know it's easy to hate on the 'grammar police' or whatever, so I'll try to be minimal and gentle here, but the posts you make with a spelling error literally every 2nd word are a bit annoying to read. I'd rather focus on the substance but it's harder, please use a spell checker or something

 

[Pat Hartman]

Yes she did, that is a fact, and she accepted it. She won the popular vote but not the electoral college vote.

But she didn't win. Because the Constitution tells us how to determine the winner. If she had won, she would have been sitting in the WH instead of DJT. Yet she persists to this day in saying that Trump and/or the Russians cheated and she actually won. And because she lost the Electoral vote, Democrats want to get rid of the Electoral College because in close races, at this stage in our political distribution, the EC favors Republicans. If Democrats want to spread out and move to fly over country, the balance could turn to favor them in a very close race. But, the Dems prefer to be close to each other so they can be in an echo chamber.

Why do you think the left is so hell-bent on importing illegal aliens? Because they know they can't win in a contest to add an amendment to the Constitution to change the way Presidents are elected so they are importing new voters. I would ask though, why if their ideas are so good for the country do they have to pay stupid people to vote for them? Shouldn't their ideas win on the merits? They should but they don't so the Dems rely on promises of "free stuff" to get votes.

 

[AccessBlaster]

Another bad day for Jack Smith, yesterday was another bad day for Fani. Is that considered winning?

 

[Isaac]

Another bad day for Jack Smith, yesterday was another bad day for Fani. Is that considered winning?

I'll bet Fani would have really liked Martin Luther King.

If you know, you know.

 

[AccessBlaster]

When does the winning start?​

Turn on the TV

 

[Isaac]

supreme court is full of home runs recently, and plenty of just following the law without regard to the outcome that people desire - exactly precisely as judicial branch ought to be.

But we can't be too careful, we all have to get out and vote. It seems like Trump is winning now, but we have to remain sober and on the alert.

the tv is full of happiness recently!

 

[AccessBlaster]

Biden and his supporters are creating new Republicans. Watch the lady in blue as she gets harassed and then ignored by Biden. People of color are starting to notice....

https://twitter.com/x/status/1809578408705421386

 

[Isaac]

People of color

Speaking literally, I am mostly Reddish-Pink in color. Why am I not a PEOPLE OF COLOR ?

 

[AccessBlaster]

Speaking literally, I am mostly Reddish-Pink in color. Why am I not a PEOPLE OF COLOR ?

Hmm, let me check my handy-dandy liberal skin color chart.

 

[AccessBlaster]

Oops! @jpl458

 

[Pat Hartman]

She took the easy way out since there were lots of other more controversial reasons, but at least she tossed the case.

 

[Isaac]

I'm kind of surprised they assigned that guy to the case, knowing it was blatantly unconstitutional; they could have easily avoided it.
It's like they wanted to lose

 

[AccessBlaster]

She took the easy way out since there were lots of other more controversial reasons, but at least she tossed the case.

I'll take the win

 

[Pat Hartman]

I'm kind of surprised they assigned that guy to the case, knowing it was blatantly unconstitutional; they could have easily avoided it.
It's like they wanted to lose

Desperate people do stupid things. I've always maintained that due to his personality, Trump would have been easy to beat without cheating.

 

[AccessBlaster]

Teamster for Trump!

 

[The_Doc_Man]

She took the easy way out since there were lots of other more controversial reasons, but at least she tossed the case.

I've been reading a lot of judicial verdicts because in another site I've been following the court cases with gun rights and the Chevron Deference doctrine. Judges usually pick something that they think will preclude or at least minimize the odds of being overturned. The more controversial the reason, the less often it will be the first thing of focus.

For instance, the recent SCOTUS mifeprestone verdict was a "no standing" issue. Doesn't preclude another case on the same subject, but does eliminate lengthy arguments for this case.

 

[AccessBlaster]

When does the winning srart? > Jan 20th​

Thought this would be a good time to resurrect this gem.

 

[The_Doc_Man]

It would appear that, when comparing earlier posts to today's reality, the winning started in the voting booths, polling places, and even at home when voting by mail. Both an EC win and a popular vote win, AND some of the "blue wall" states turned red this year.

There are enough blame-pointers on YouTube to choke a wood-chipper. I don't need to reference them. The folks who have a reasonable grip on reality have pointed out that the "woke" crowd ignored the real interests of the American people, ignored their concerns about inflation and food availability, ignored their concern over the economic and political costs of illegal immigration. Even the LEGAL Hispanic immigrants were against the illegals this time around.

Point fingers all you want. But for those who feel that DJT did something wrong, may I respectfully suggest to start looking HARD in your mirror to see what is actually there. And I also suggest you contemplate pendulums.

 

[Steve R.]

When does the winning start? > Jan 20th​

Thought this would be a good time to resurrect this gem.

There is an irony in this. The Democrats are now openly proposing to obstruct Trump. This will be a repeat of all the hoaxes, unjustified impeachments, and lawfare that was initiated beginning in 2016. Winning could start should Democrats propose to work with Republicans. Instead they want to thwart Trump which makes a mockery of their (false) claims for unity and working together. The hope is that Republicans will finally develop the courage to roll-over Democratic obstructionism. Then the winning can start.