This thread was started by some racist comments by a Cambridge academic who said the phrase "White lives matter" is racist. Well, she is at it again. A comprehensive investigation into race relations in the UK has the black guy in charge linked to a Nazi propagandist.
Cambridge academic Dr Priyamvada Gopal (pictured) asked if she was right to think Dr Tony Sewell - who oversaw the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities - was 'not in fact Dr'.
www.dailymail.co.uk
A commentator noted:
Architect Chris Rose wrote: 'The black author of the race report is being compared to an actual Nazi by an academic at Cambridge University.
She really is quite the vile human being, relishing in the protection afforded to ethnic minorities on these sorts of issues. I hope she gets her comeuppance one day, in whatever form that may be. If you want to talk about hate-speech, this is the very definition of it. Because the report disputes her opinion of race relations in the UK, she goes low while the report goes high, discrediting herself and showing what a lowlife she is.
When will others start to call out the racism from some ethnic minorities, rather than turning a blind eye to it all? The report suggests that poor white boys are the most disadvantaged group in the UK, from my brief overview. Yet very little media attention is given to it. This left-wing anti-white agenda is disgraceful and the left should be ashamed of their moral positions. They try to position themselves as compassionate moral actors, yet while espousing their own virtues, they are simultaneously saying, "nothing to see over there". It really is quite incredible.
When will the left start to look at people without treating them differently based on skin colour? Many years ago, their conviction was that this was a racist thing to do. Yet they just can't help themselves and have reverted to type.
It seems that they have a virtue signalling continuum, where you have a scale of very unequal treatment to equal to very favourable treatment for minorities.
Very unequal ------------ Equal ------------ Very favourable
Instead of raising the bar from previously unequal treatment to equal treatment, they have misinterpreted the scale to thinking that the more favourable the treatment, the more virtuous they are. But this is false. Once you go past equal, you have become racist.
Very racist ------------ Equal ------------ Very racist
So, here is the Republicans position:
Very unequal ------------ Equal (Republicans)------------ Very favourable
Here is the Democrats position:
Very unequal ------------ Equal ------------ Very favourable (Democrats)
They have misinterpreted what racism actually is. Or, perhaps it is less misinterpretation and more about appealing to your group, trying to outdo one another on how virtuous you are perceived to be. There just is no going too far if the losing group are white male.
Clearly, racism is the central theme of the Democrat party. They constantly talk about race, whilst being the party of racism. It is like shouting about how un-racist they are, while displaying pro-black anti-white sentiment.
Do any others here agree with this interpretation?
en.wikipedia.org
