White Lives Don't Matter - apparently

[Steve R.]

Arroyo: Politicians exploiting Atlanta tragedy are weakening America | Fox News Video

Raymond Arroyo addresses mainstream media coverage of Tuesday's shootings at Georgia spas

video.foxnews.com

At the approximate three (3) minute mark, note were Arroyo brings up the topic that the Biden administration on one hand calls for an end to racial injustice to Asians. Yet in the situation where Yale University actively discriminated against Asians violating their civil rights, the Biden administration drops the discrimination lawsuit against Yale!!! No civil rights protection for Asians.

Just before the five (5) minute mark, Arroyo delves into anti-Semitic violence. All forms of violence are to be condemned, but the Biden administration is being blind to anti-Semitic violence. Can one therefore conclude that Jewish lives don't matter and that the Biden administration is actually anti-Semitic? That conclusion may be excessive, but realistically the unfortunate loathsome reality is that "protecting" Asians is the "hot topic" of the moment, all this professed concern for the welfare of Asians will evaporate with the next "hot topic".

 

[Pat Hartman]

As I've said many times, hypocrisy reigns The public is waking up from the Kool-Aid though. Probably because they stopped watching CNN and so are not getting their daily dose anymore.

 

[Steve R.]

Both Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham have excellent monologues on how the "left" wing media continues to push an anti-white race baiting narratives on the public before any of the facts are even known. Laura even goes a bit further to assert that the narratives being espoused by the Democrats serve the purpose of designating Republicans as the "Domestic Terrorists".

Of interest too (actually outside the scope of this thread, but discussed by Laura), the Democrats have used this last mass killing event as an "excuse" to once again make inflammatory demands for gun control as being the "solution". But, it appears that the shooter was known to the FBI. Consequently, it would seem that the performance of the FBI itself needs to be examined before jumping on the anti-gun band wagon. Why didn't the FBI take any action before the event? Additionally, the Democrats anti-gun arguments are riddled with false premises. Democrats apparently do not seem to care about Black on Black gun violence, Democrats push to defund/re-imagine law enforcement, and they seek to be increasingly lenient in terms of keeping criminals in prison.

Finally, at approximately the seven (7) minute mark of Laura's monologue is the crucial summary conclusion. The Democrats are seeking to declare Republicans as the "Domestic Terrorists".

Video link:https://video.foxnews.com/v/6243239610001

Video link:https://video.foxnews.com/v/6243259433001

 

[AccessBlaster]

 

[Isaac]

Thank you, AB, for that reminder! And in other news, aren't we all going to run out of yard signs soon

 

[AccessBlaster]

Lol, I thought it was a critical piece of information.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Someone needs to publish the statistics.
Number of Asians - Number of "hate" crimes against Asians
Number of Jews - Number of "hate" crimes against Jews.

The question though is should the blocking of admission for Asians to Ivy League colleges be considered a hate crime? Biden stopped the prosecution of this crime that was initiated by the Trump administration so apparently he's on board with it. We can't have so many yellow faces around us. Their educational excellent makes the rest of us look like slugs because they KNOW the importance of education.

I think you'll find that like the number of unarmed blacks killed while being arrested is noting like what you expect given the prominence of the reporting in the media.

I believe that the media have devolved to considering any crime perpetuated against one racial/religious/ethnic group/sexual orientation against a person who is different is a hate crime EXCEPT if the victim is white. They have to do something to keep us divided.

 

[AccessBlaster]

The Georgia spa shootings and the recent Colorado shootings did not fit nicely into the liberal play book. So the media is moving on to the next tantalizing tidbit they can manufacture about race.

The media is the only one pushing the race narrative, most folks go about their day not noticing race.

 

[Pat Hartman]

A Muslim immigrant who thinks he has been discriminated against killing white people isn't a hate crime though.

 

[AccessBlaster]

 

[Isaac]

Finally, some consequence for open, unabashed white race hating. Rare..

USA Today editor accuses company of being 'subservient to white authority' after she was fired for a tweet

A race and inclusion editor for USA Today's Sports Media Group wrote in a blog post published Friday that she was fired over an inaccurate tweet about the Colorado shooting, and accused the media company of being "subservient to white authority."

www.cnn.com

 

[Jon]

@Isaac In response to mass shootings, it is interesting that she says this:

"It's always an angry white man. always."

...followed by this:

"It was a careless error of judgement, sent at a heated time, that doesn't represent my commitment to racial equality."

It is clear to me that she has no interest in committing to racial equality. Instead, she wants to hate on white people. To her, racial equality is pro-black, anti-white. That is not racial equality. That is the very definition of racism itself. And it seems to also be the position of the Democrat party.

But for now, let us ignore her clear racism - from a race and inclusion editor at that. Instead, let us look at the statistics to see if there is any merit in what she says.

The following site shows a graph of the numbers of mass shottings in the US, broken down by race:

Mass shootings by shooter’s race in the U.S. 2024 | Statista

Between 1982 and September 2024, 82 out of the 151 mass shootings in the United States were carried out by White shooters.

www.statista.com

It shows that 54% of mass shootings are from white people, while the percentage of whites in the US is 60.1%. So, if you are white, you are less likely to be a white shooter than if you are black (0.90). Black mass shooters represent 17% of all cases, while backs are only 13.4% of the population (1.27). You are therefore more likely to be a mass shooter if you are black than if you are white, equalising for numbers by race.

This race and inclusion editor, who is committed to racial equality, seems to want to vilify a race that is different to hers. When will those who want to fight against racism stop their own racism?

 

[Isaac]

@Isaac In response to mass shootings, it is interesting that she says this:


...followed by this:


It is clear to me that she has no interest in committing to racial equality. Instead, she wants to hate on white people. To her, racial equality is pro-black, anti-white. That is not racial equality. That is the very definition of racism itself. And it seems to also be the position of the Democrat party.

But for now, let us ignore her clear racism - from a race and inclusion editor at that. Instead, let us look at the statistics to see if there is any merit in what she says.

The following site shows a graph of the numbers of mass shottings in the US, broken down by race:

Mass shootings by shooter’s race in the U.S. 2024 | Statista

Between 1982 and September 2024, 82 out of the 151 mass shootings in the United States were carried out by White shooters.

www.statista.com

It shows that 54% of mass shootings are from white people, while the percentage of whites in the US is 60.1%. So, if you are white, you are less likely to be a white shooter than if you are black (0.90). Black mass shooters represent 17% of all cases, while backs are only 13.4% of the population (1.27). You are therefore more likely to be a mass shooter if you are black than if you are white, equalising for numbers by race.

This race and inclusion editor, who is committed to racial equality, seems to want to vilify a race that is different to hers. When will those who want to fight against racism stop their own racism?

Yep. And of course, those are only the 'mass shootings' statistics. What about just "regular" shootings (if there is any such thing!). Like 20 people get shot in Chicago every weekend. I would ask Democrats: Care to look up their mugshots? Should we stop racializing every issue now or should I continue.....

 

[Pat Hartman]

KenyaPrime - business and guide to career

business and guide to career

kenyaprime.com

Let's compare the two charts.

Race	% of Popn	% of Mass shootings
White	76.6%​	54.0%​
Black	13.4%​	17.0%​
Latino	18.1%​	8.0%​
Asian	5.8%​	5.6%​
American Indian	0.2%​	2.3%​

Looks like Whites and Latinos are less likely to commit a mass murder than the other categories

That's the problem with taking numbers out of context.

 

[Jon]

That is essentially identical to my post, although I used Wikipedia for the US demographics. There are more white's doing mass shootings because it is a predominantly white population, not because of being white. As the above stats show, being white means less likely to be a mass shooter, not more.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Sorry Jon, I forgot to read the rest of your post after I looked at the link

 

[Jon]

That's ok Pat. It just shows that are thinking travels along identical lines with this issue.

 

[Jon]

Something interesting I looked up. Out of the top 3 dealiest mass shootings since 1949, only 1 was white. Just saying.

Mass shootings in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[AccessBlaster]

 

[Pat Hartman]

Jon, How did you figure out that only 1 was white? Did you read all the stories?