The crime rate in New York (3 Viewers)

[MarkK]

Trump never used the power of the state to persecute/lock-up Hillary

Duh, there was never any evidence she committed a crime. The power of the state would have protected her against specious charges.

But Mr. FalselyOrangeInColour is revealingly sensitive to criminality, cit. "Lock her up," "Biden crime family," and "Murderers and rapists." This is because Mr. FOIC knows himself to be a criminal, and so criminality is always front-of-mind for him, always on the tip of his tongue. Sad.

 

[Isaac]

Duh, there was never any evidence she committed a crime. The power of the state would have protected her against specious charges.

But Mr. FalselyOrangeInColour is revealingly sensitive to criminality, cit. "Lock her up," "Biden crime family," and "Murderers and rapists." This is because Mr. FOIC knows himself to be a criminal, and so criminality is always front-of-mind for him, always on the tip of his tongue. Sad.

That post doesn't even ring as if you believe it yourself lol. I say keep the trials coming, he keeps going up in the polls

 

[moke123]

I say keep the trials coming, he keeps going up in the polls

I agree. I saw those polls and yeah he's going up. Isn't it something like 50% of independents think he's guilty and should drop out of the race.
Here's to hoping he continues to climb. Cheers!

 

[Jon]

Don't forget the $200+ million he has raised in 3 days or so. That has got to help Mr D's chances at the ballot box.

 

[GaP42]

Used for tRumps legal expenses ... ? Another fraud. No surprises.

 

[Jon]

Used for tRumps legal expenses ... ? Another fraud. No surprises.

We are still waiting to find a first fraud.

 

[GaP42]

34 Counts of Falsification of Business Records
He is increasing the crime rate by himself - supporting his own claims :
Criminal deception.

 

[Jon]

What was the crime?

 

[GaP42]

Guilty of 34 Counts of Falsification of Business Records

 

[Jon]

That is a misdemeanour, which had expired.

 

[GaP42]

Guilty of 34 Counts of Falsification of Business Records

 

[moke123]

That is a misdemeanour, which had expired.

That's why it was charged as a felony, without the lesser included misdemeanor, which has a longer SOL.
That and the fact all SOL's were tolled during the pandemic.
Pretty sure the first MTD were on those grounds.

 

[moke123]

Don't forget the $200+ million he has raised in 3 days or so. That has got to help Mr D's chances at the ballot box.

That's IF it is true. Don't forget he has a little problem with truth. See what the FEC filings say.

Who's Mr. D?

We are still waiting to find a first fraud.

Jury had no problem finding it.

I've been reading some of the trial transcripts. Fascinating stuff.

Have you heard anything about the new mystery federal investigation that's supposedly happening?
Apparently it came to light last Thursday and was overlooked in the news due to the historic verdict.

 

[Jon]

That's why it was charged as a felony, without the lesser included misdemeanor, which has a longer SOL.

Yes indeed. But what was the crime?

 

[GaP42]

Guilty of 34 Counts of Falsification of Business Records
Falsifying business records is criminal. Deliberately hiding the purpose of the money transacted in public records. Would you be OK with business being able to make up where money is expended?

 

[Jon]

Guilty of 34 Counts of Falsification of Business Records
Falsifying business records is criminal. Deliberately hiding the purpose of the money transacted in public records. Would you be OK with business being able to make up where money is expended?

That was an expired misdemeanour. And what should he put it down as on his expenses?

 

[GaP42]

Guilty of 34 Counts of Falsification of Business Records
Guilty of a felony : I am not an accountant or a lawyer. Do you think it was a legal expense? Do you believe it was done to deceive/hide?
Sorry, may be it does not matter what you think, or me. What matters is he was charged, it was adjudicated under a lawful process and the jury found him guilty.

 

[Jon]

The issue here is that liberals cannot state what crime he committed because the jury were never given the opportunity to specific a crime. Instead, they were given 3 different possible crimes, and none had to agree on which he committed. Highly unusual. No one has seen this before. I believe the options were state tax fraud, federal tax fraud or a campaign violation of influencing an election. No one knows which crime he had supposedly committed.

Indeed he was charged. But just like the blacks were unfairly found guilty in courts by Klan members in the past, the reason there is an appellate system is to reassess miscarriages of justice. Or in other words, being found guilty by a jury in a lower court does not mean you are guilty. Otherwise, if a case gets overturned by an appellate court, you are saying the person is both guilty and not guilty at the same time, both of which cannot be true.

 

[GaP42]

Guilty of 34 Counts of Falsification of Business Records

being found guilty by a jury in a lower court does not mean you are guilty

Are you sure? - he was found guilty. An appeal(s) may be pending, but he stands guilty.
Guilty of each of the three crimes you put forward?

 

[Jon]

Again, in the law he stands guilty but it doesn't mean to say he is guilty as charged. Do you believe that those charged with a guilty verdict but got reversed on appeal are guilty? Or do you recognise that innocent people who were never guilty can get charged with a guilty verdict that gets reversed on appeal?

The jury were never given the opportunity to say if they all agree on which crime he allegedly committed. The judge said pick any of the 3 stated crimes. And you don't have to agree on which one he committed. This is unprecedented.

The Trump hating judge set things up which have never been seen before. He wanted to ensure a Trump conviction and so engineered his jury instructions to make it so.