Currency re-vamp

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rich
  • Start date Start date
ColinEssex said:
Question - is a "bitch" (an American term for wife I understand) worse or better than a "son of a bitch"? which presumably is the male offspring of any American wife
Col

Black Americans are about the only Americans that use that term for their wives and girlfriends. There are some very young Americans, of all races, that have kind of jumped on board with the black lifestyle being chic, so they've picked up on it and started using the term also, but America as a whole does not call their wives by that name.

SOB you know the answer to. They are all over the whole and not just in the USA, so they wouldn't be the offspring of just an American wife.
 
Matty said:
Ah I see. So the things he did weren't bad at the time, because it was perfectly normal.
I have no idea, but if you say so - you are after all from Canada :D

Dan said:
Is that what Bill Wyman, Gary Glitter, Pete Townshend thought of paedophilia in the UK? That it was the norm?

I am not aware of their thoughts on that subject?

Col
 
ColinEssex said:
I am not aware of their thoughts on that subject?

So your telepathic ability is only limited to John Lennon then? :rolleyes:
 
ColinEssex said:
I am not aware of their thoughts on that subject?

Col
"At age 47, Bill Wyman began a relationship with 13-year old Mandy Smith, with her mother's blessing."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Wyman


"In late 2005, Gary Glitter was arrested and charged with ra** of under-aged girls. Early in 2006, he was convicted of committing obscene acts with minors and sentenced to imprisonment; he filed an appeal, but this was dismissed on 15 June 2006."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Glitter


"In 2003 Townshend received a police caution after acknowledging a solitary paid access of a child pornography website in 1999."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pete_Townshend
 
ShaneMan said:
SOB you know the answer to.
Had I known the answer, I wouldn't have asked. I wanted to know if saying one was "more offensive" than saying the other. "son of a bitch" is not in use in the UK, primarily because its an American phrase ( not popular in the UK);) :rolleyes: and "bitch" is very rarely used.

I remember "gee whiz" was used when I was a kid, but that was because it was in the title of a top 10 UK hit at the time. Nobody had any idea what it meant, we just said it alot

Col
 
Matty said:
"At age 47, Bill Wyman began a relationship with 13-year old Mandy Smith, with her mother's blessing."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Wyman


"In late 2005, Gary Glitter was arrested and charged with ra** of under-aged girls. Early in 2006, he was convicted of committing obscene acts with minors and sentenced to imprisonment; he filed an appeal, but this was dismissed on 15 June 2006."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Glitter


"In 2003 Townshend received a police caution after acknowledging a solitary paid access of a child pornography website in 1999."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pete_Townshend

as I said I am not aware of their thoughts on that subject. Your guess is as good as mine.

Col
 
ColinEssex said:
but obviously John thought that was the norm in the USA - it certainly is now:confused:

Matt - Here's a still featuring Arnie:rolleyes:

arnie.jpg


Col

Was this taken before or after he'd had acting lessons?;)
 
ColinEssex said:
Had I known the answer, I wouldn't have asked. I wanted to know if saying one was "more offensive" than saying the other. "son of a bitch" is not in use in the UK, primarily because its an American phrase ( not popular in the UK);) :rolleyes: and "bitch" is very rarely used.

I remember "gee whiz" was used when I was a kid, but that was because it was in the title of a top 10 UK hit at the time. Nobody had any idea what it meant, we just said it alot
Col

Sorry for jumping to conclusions, Col, cause calling someone that is very offensive and I thought you "knew" what you were referring to. I guess I can't speak for the whole county but where I was raised, if you were looking for a fight, then calling someone that was a good way to accomplish your goal.:)
 
ColinEssex said:
as I said I am not aware of their thoughts on that subject. Your guess is as good as mine.

Col

As Dan had mentioned, it's amazing that you can know the thoughts of John Lennon, but not the above three. :rolleyes:
 
Matty said:
As Dan had mentioned, it's amazing that you can know the thoughts of John Lennon, but not the above three. :rolleyes:

Perhaps you have to be dead for the Ouija board to work :p
 
Colin, thanks for your interest:

Doc_Man, would you say if the Katrina thing happened in New York or Washington or California the clear-up would be much speedier? I always get the impression that the Southern states are the poor relations in the US - stemming back to the populace being significantly non-white

I doubt it is black/white. It might be "continued punishment for being a former part of the Confederacy" - the voting rights act was renewed recently with CONTINUED supervision of redistricting in southern states. What a joke!

It might also be that the SCOPE of the devastation is so huge that folks don't even know where to start. It might truly just be too big a problem for anyone to seriously grasp. Katrina whacked some areas so badly that the houses in some localized communities are 100% gone. Waveland, MS for example has no houses left standing. We had friends there who sent us photos showing mud and a bare concrete foundation where a three-story near-mansion had stood. In St. Bernard Parish (E & SE of N'Awlins), I think there were less than 200 houses NOT damaged or destroyed by the storm. Out of tens of thousands of houses. Plaquemines parish lost so much land to tidal erosion that we may have to redesignate our parish boundaries. There might not be enough of the parish left to qualify for representation.

I'll ask you to reconsider the closest evidence we have to the answer to your question. How long after 9/11 did it take for New York City to start a serious rebuilding program of the affected area? First, it was northern. Second, devastating though it was, the affected area was geographically small.

If you were to visit a site called NOLA.COM, you would perhaps be able to browse through some photo galleries, directly or by following references. It is impossible to believe unless you see the pictures. The recent flooding in northern states was tragic, don't get me wrong, but most of them suffered a couple of feet of water. We have places where the peak of a one-story house's roof was under water. Fifteen to twenty feet of water. Boats were able to pull up even to the roof to rescue people.

Every day I drive through an area near Fleur de Lis Blvd where water was even with or above the eaves of houses. Some of the pictures on NOLA.COM would show this area. Some streets are totally lost with no sign of life. Others have a few returnees. But the big problem is that one insurer, who happens to cover about 20% of the state's homeowner's policies, wants to either pull out or drop certain types of coverage. We have a state law that says if they want to stay in business in this state, they can't do that. So it will probably come down to a lawsuit very soon.

What? Why won't we let them limit their liability? Well, in a year where Katrina caused the biggest single USA natural disaster in terms of area and number of people affected, this insurer made a mere $1.21 BILLION dollars in AFTER-TAX PROFIT. They THINK they are entitled to be guaranteed a profit, forgetting that ALL businesses are about risk, not just insurance companies. EVERY BUSINESS YOU START has the right to TRY to make a profit - but no business is guaranteed one.

But I digress.

Colin, part of our problem is also logistical. For a long time we had no working roads from the East. I-10 across Lake Ponchartrain was so badly damaged as to be impassible. US 11 has a narrow, one-lane-each-way bridge that was weakened by the storm. The Lake Ponchartrain Causeway was at least temporarily damaged. The only roads were from the west, where there is more land and less water to cross.

Another factor is that there was no place for the workers to stay even if they wanted to come in and repair things. Contractors were literally living in tent cities for a long time. We are STILL in the demolition phase on major apartment complexes and whole neighborhoods because of the dearth of available workers.

My cousin's boyfriend talked to me about the aftermath of Andrew. He's a plumber. He said that if he could have managed it, he could have worked 7 days a week, sunrise to sunset, with guaranteed work lasting for not less than 6 months before it started to die down. He got to the point that he had to start taking 1 week off at a time because it was so depressing.

OK, now multiply that concept by carpenters, electricians, plumbers, house demolition teams, and general laborers. Multiply that by literally a few thousand square MILES of devastation. (Remember, a thousand square miles is a square only about 31 2/3 miles on a side...) How many houses are in a square mile in a relatively densely populated area? It is staggering.

Part of the problem is getting supplies. At least initially, according to a guy my wife talked to, a well-known building supply chain was getting 20 big truck loads (18-wheeler, full-sized trailers) a night and was sold out by the close of business in a limited work day. I.e. instead of being open 8 AM to 10 PM, they were doing 10 AM to 6 PM - and they STILL sold out of every basic construction supply you could imagine. My wife also talked to an insurance adjuster who had somehow learned that the entire year's output of a major maker of sheet rock was already committed to the New Orleans area. Think about that for a little while.
 
Matty said:
As Dan had mentioned, it's amazing that you can know the thoughts of John Lennon, but not the above three. :rolleyes:

There is a limit to the number of people I know thoughts of :rolleyes:

and I'm afraid the 3 others mentioned are of no interest to me.

Col
 
ColinEssex said:
and I'm afraid the 3 others mentioned are of no interest to me.

What about Keith Richards then - any interest there?
 
dan-cat said:
What about Keith Richards then - any interest there?
Keefy is a brilliant artist. His paintings are superb, there was a programme on about it. He's off the drugs now (apart from the fags) He owns homes in many countries.

Col
 
ColinEssex said:
He's off the drugs now (apart from the fags) He owns homes in many countries.

His US neighbors will be delighted with the news :rolleyes:
 
For those who are curious, try this link to see what the city looked like from above after Katrina:

http://ngs.woc.noaa.gov/katrina/KATRINA0000.HTM

To see the area near where I live:

On the map that has large boxes and shows the path of Katrina, find the box that is centered over the southern shore of the big lake (Ponchartrain). It is 2nd from the top in the column that has five boxes. Click that.

You'll see the south shore in greater detail. On the top row of boxes, count 11 boxes starting from the left. It is

http://ngs.woc.noaa.gov/storms/katrina/24425627.jpg

I'm in that area.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom