Harris/Walz Ticket

AccessBlaster said:
www.rev.com

Donald Trump Leaked Unedited | 60 Minutes | Transcripts

Today President Donald Trump posted the full, unedited 60 Minutes interview transcript with him and Lesley Stahl, which was set to air Sunday October 25. Trump abruptly ended the interview early. Read the full transcript here.
www.rev.com www.rev.com


Lesley Stahl: (24:21)
So this story about Hunter and his laptop, some repair shop found it, the source is Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani.

Donald Trump: (24:33)
I don’t know anything about that. I just know it’s a laptop and they haven’t-

Donald Trump: (25:41)
Of course it can be verified. Excuse me, they found a laptop. Lesley, listen.

Lesley Stahl: (25:47)
The laptop.

Donald Trump: (25:48)
Why do you say that? Even the family hasn’t… The family on the laptop… He’s gone into hiding for five days, he’s gone into hiding.
Click to expand...

Bam. Like I said. And you are a saint for taking the time to find it! 👍👍
 
Who the hell does this woman think she is? Everytime Trump opens his mouth, she calls him a liar. Why does she keep inserting herself into the interview? Who cares what her opinions are? If you are going to challenge the answer to every question you ask, at least do it to every other person you interview. See how many of them come back for seconds.
 
The point is, Donald Trump had to leak his own interview, because 60 minutes is an arm of the Democrat Party. Their mission is to discredit the opposition.
 
Pat Hartman said:
Who the hell does this woman think she is? Everytime Trump opens his mouth, she calls him a liar. Why does she keep inserting herself into the interview?
Click to expand...
I'm responding to your comments within the context of the article below where: "Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis bashed Vice President Kamala Harris for attempting to insert herself into the response to hurricanes Helene and Milton on Thursday."
www.foxnews.com

DeSantis fires back at Harris over hurricane response: 'She has no role in this process'

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis called out Vice President Kamala Harris for getting political in the response to hurricanes Helene and Milton on Thursday.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Harris is apparently losing to Trump, even if it is not currently reflected in the polls. Harris, consequently needs to generate "face time" and foment anti-Trump hysteria to become relevant in the election process.

In journalism there is a saying, "if bleeds, it leads". Apparently Harris' attempt creating "bleeding" through hyperbolic adversarial rhetoric is failing since the media does not seem to have her in the headlines as being the Joan of Arc leading the charge to save this country from the ravages of Helene and Milton.

DeSantis and Harris have clashed in recent days after the governor declined to take a call from Harris regarding the hurricane response. He said Thursday that Harris has "no role" in the process and added that she had never attempted to call him during previous storms in Florida.

"I am working with the president of the United States. I'm working with the director of FEMA [Federal Emergency Management Agency]. We've been doing this now nonstop for over two weeks," DeSantis said Thursday.
Click to expand...
 
Harris lies. Misquotes Trump's (joking) dictatorship statement. Harris lied that Trump will weaponize the justice system. It is actually the Democrats who have weaponized the justice system. Finally, Harris never answered the question of how she got "elected" to be the Democratic party presidential candidate.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1844718089205678143
 
Harris has no shame. Her chutzpah is is beyond belief. She just comes out and lies by (falsely) claiming that she has a secure border policy that can't be challenged.
www.nationalreview.com

After Presiding over Border Chaos, Harris Says She Would Put Her Immigration Record ‘Up against Anyone’ | National Review

As ‘border czar’ for the Biden administration, Harris presided over a record increase in illegal immigration.
www.nationalreview.com www.nationalreview.com
Vice President Kamala Harris, who was tasked with overseeing immigration policy for an administration that saw record increases in illegal border crossings, now says she would put her record on the issue “up against anyone.”
Click to expand...
She touted her past experience as a prosecutor and said, “I would put my record up against anyone in terms of the work I’ve always done and will always do to ensure we have a secure border.”
Click to expand...
Harris flaunts her past experience as a prosecutor, but never provides any specific examples. Mark Levin had a person who was a victim of pedophile priests. According to Levin's guest, Harris never prosecuted any of those priests.

Soon after taking office, Biden tasked Harris with addressing illegal immigration as a primary piece of her vice-presidential portfolio. Harris, however, refused to reform, or even discuss, the lax enforcement policies ushered in by Biden’s day-one executive orders, insisting instead that she was focused on addressing the “root causes” of immigration — namely by doling out economic aid to Central and South American nations.
Click to expand...

Harris called the immigration system “broken” and said that a bill proposed by the Biden-Harris administration would have created an earned pathway to citizenship for many undocumented immigrants. She then again turned the topic to the border and blamed Trump for his role in tanking the bipartisan immigration bill.
Click to expand...
Harris did not mention deportation in this exchange. Simply implied that those who are illegal immigrants would simply get a pathway to citizenship. Whatever that is. However, in a prior speech, Harris did say that those who entered this country illegally would be deported. So she has created confusion as to what her policy would really be, should she be elected president.
ny1.com

Harris promises immigration reforms, stronger enforcement in visit to border

Trump has consistently led in immigration polling among voters, who see him as likely being more effective than Harris on the issue
ny1.com ny1.com
To that end, Harris unveiled two sets of of planned actions on border enforcement and immigration reform. On enforcement, Harris pledged to continue Biden administration rules to bar undocumented border crossers from receiving asylum, as well as a promise to arrest, deport and impose a five-year ban on migrants who have crossed "between ports of entry."
Click to expand...
So will she let illegal immigrants enter at the ports of entry and/or illegally flown into this country?

Bill Whitaker asked Harris: "Was it a mistake to loosen the immigration policies as much as you did?”
Harris responded: "It’s a long-standing problem, and solutions are at hand,” Harris said. “And from Day One, literally, we have been offering solutions.” That is an evasive non-answer. So for nearly four years, Harris has not "fixed" the broken system. And the unstated solutions by Harris would not have stopped illegal immigration but simply legitimized it. Meaning the illegal immigrants would still come.
 
"Columbus: the guy who showed up without papers, claimed the place as his own, and somehow avoided getting deported. Classic immigrant move! But if you hate Columbus, you might be a bigot, right?"
 
AccessBlaster said:
"Columbus: the guy who showed up without papers, claimed the place as his own, and somehow avoided getting deported. Classic immigrant move! But if you hate Columbus, you might be a bigot, right?"
Click to expand...
Harris' remarks are a classic case of applying both 21st century morals and wokism. In the 15th century it was normal to, ra**, pillage, and conquest. Not only was it normal but every culture participated, be it the American natives, Europeans, and Arabs. Not to also mention that native American participated human sacrifice and cannibalism. The progressive left never mentions the "evil" side of native American culture and Black culture of that time period (1500AD).
 
The cartoon below came out before Bret Baier interviewed Kamala Harris. Based on her inability to answer any questions, this cartoon seems even more appropriate. One of the more egregious non-answer evasive responses concerned the law. Harris stated that she would follow the law. That was a blatant evasion. First, the Biden/Harris administration has not been following the law. Second, the law is subject to change, so how can you follow something that is as yet unstated? She is supposed to be telling the voters what she would do and she is not.
1729168601242.png
 
Steve R. said:
She is supposed to be telling the voters what she would do and she is not.
Click to expand...
If she told voters what she would do, NO ONE would vote for her. Just look at how she did as herself in the 2020 primary. You'd think she would have done better given that her policies are very similar to Bernie's but she was so unlikable that she couldn't get any traction. Just before the Biden/Trump debate which took Biden off the table, the Dems were trying to figure out how to get away with dumping the 'black woman' from the ticket without arousing the ire of those who check boxes.
 
In Bret Baier's interview with Kamala Harris a lot of time was spent on illegal immigration. Harris lied when she claimed that she was working on a solution to a "broken" immigration system. The most obvious fact is that Biden/Harris have actually opened the border to illegal immigrant, which means they have done nothing substantive.

The Fox News pundits have been calling the Biden/Harris efforts a "failure". Actually, Biden/Harris have succeeded. They are not trying to "fix" immigration to prevent illegal immigration which is what the public expects. Biden/Harris wanted an open border. They have succeeded.
 
moke123 said:
Should be a busy weekend for the media.
Click to expand...
Election interference at its finest. They only agreed to this to make a "problem" for Trump. If there were no possible awkwardness, then the judge would not have allowed the document release or would have released it unredacted. The redactions will be protecting the prosecution, screw the accused. This is no longer America.
 
Pat Hartman said:
The redactions will be protecting the prosecution, screw the accused.
Click to expand...
The redactions are to protect the witnesses.

Aren't you at all interested at what the witnesses have testified to? What evidence there is? Or do you prefer to keep your head in the sand and only believe what trump instructs you to believe?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Steve R.
Dershowitz Flips!
Replies
0
Views
115
Steve R.
Steve R.
Steve R.
Believe All Women
Replies
1
Views
64
Pat Hartman
P
Steve R.
Sorkin Dishonestly Attacks Ackman
Replies
13
Views
293
Steve R.
Steve R.
J
The real J D Vance
3 4 5
Replies
95
Views
1,386
moke123
moke123
Uncle Gizmo
Get me to the Church on - Oh Sh*t, the Roads Blocked
Replies
1
Views
229
Pat Hartman
P

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top Bottom