Mick Jagger
Registered User.
- Local time
- Yesterday, 17:36
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2008
- Messages
- 43
Doesn't appear that they do
That does appear to be the case.
Anybody want to know the secret to understanding the U. S. Constitution?
Doesn't appear that they do
Anybody want to know the secret to understanding the U. S. Constitution?
Only if you have valid information
that wasn't taught in 9th grade.
If it's another bashing expedition, no.
So Obama and/or his campaign was allowing Rev.Wright to speak on his/their behalf up until April 29 or were the opinions of the good Reverend considered FORMER prior to the announcement?
QUOTE]
I don't recall a quote being attributed to the Rev. Wright without the qualifier FORMER PASTOR being included.
I am open to correction on this one.
I don't recall a quote being attributed to the Rev. Wright without the qualifier FORMER PASTOR being included.
I am open to correction on this one.
I won't bash you for not knowing the secret.
I think you just did. But, I'm not worried about being bashed. Nor am I worried about others being bashed. I just don't want to hear you talk about it.
If you have valid information that comes from a valid source, sure, I'd love to hear about it, since you requested. However, if you want to bash Bush, America, American leaders, Americans, or anybody else, you can post whatever you want, I just am not interested and won't read more than a couple of lines, since you asked.
The secret is that the lawmakers didn't mean for us to gather the meaning of the Constitution from what they believed. They meant for us to use objective well established rules to ascertain the meaning of the language in the Constitution.
The words "well established" means conservative to me.
method to interpret the will of the legislator, is by exploring his intentions at the time when the law was made, by signs the most natural and probable.
What's wrong with this statement?
But the dissent’s argument for the original understanding is flawed from the outset by its failure to consider the full range of evidence showing what the Framers believed.
--MCCREARY COUNTY V. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIESUNION OF KY.
The United States would not have their constitution without the Haudenosaunee people. It was all heavily influenced by the Iroquois' Great Law of Peace.
Over the years, liberal judges have twisted the First Amendment's phrase about "free exercise of religion" to mean the opposite — that you are not free to exercise your religion if atheists or members of non-Christian religions say that they are offended.
--Thomas Sowell
Of course, one reason the Iroquois peace lasted so long may have been they had the Hurons and Algoquins to make war on.
I wouldn't think so. He seems to have an amazing capacity to leap from one non sequitur to the next.So was Mother Teresa. You have a point?