That is obviously wacka doodoo. It was for some super specialized data engineers, plus support. We won't need those ratios to eliminate jobs.1200/day, wow
1200/day, wow
But I think it's safer to assume someone will create tools to understand it better.
How can the machine possibly know what we can understand and what we can not? It needs feedback. Now, if you replace your last "it" with "itself", that's nightmare fuel, and I know quite a few people who would give the AI the tools it needs for something like that.But I think it's safer to assume AI will create tools to understand it better.
I've been trying to learn the best ways to do that. I read something interesting today. 59% of some kind of marketing folks would give up 10% of their paychecks before they would get rid of the AIs that can create images, content, and videos.If by business model you mean to draw up a business plan - i.e. market analysis, source and use of capital, projections for growth etc, make sure you ask the right questions in the right way.
If AI could replace humans making judgment calls then all people trading stocks would be rich by now given the software they have used that it has incorporated AI for many yearsIf by business model you mean to draw up a business plan - i.e. market analysis, source and use of capital, projections for growth etc, make sure you ask the right questions in the right way.
that is because it does 90% of their work59% of some kind of marketing folks would give up 10% of their paychecks before they would get rid of the AIs that can create images, content, and videos.
That being the case, can AI pick the all the winners on a racecard?If AI could replace humans making judgment calls then all people trading stocks would be rich by now given the software they have used that it has incorporated AI for many years
I think the trading computers that are really good at it are being used by people that can afford to keep it from the rest of us, and secret.If AI could replace humans making judgment calls then all people trading stocks would be rich by now given the software they have used that it has incorporated AI for many years
Maybe we should stop calling it getting rich. Maybe we should call it what it really is, becoming King.And not only that, but stop and think for a moment about trading data. It's the most empirical, black-and-white, clear, solid data you can get. Every day, every price, every stock, every event.
And still, only a few people get rich.
The incorporation of AI people are trying now is much less well armed. It has googly information including opinion, conjecture, speculation, and a few facts along the way. People need to be careful, as the news stories coming out about embarassing stupid things people have tried to use AI for are growing exponentially
Therein lies the problem. The genie is out of the bottle and reading everything available on the internet. Learning everything we know and understanding it well enough to write summaries.I know quite a few people who would give the AI the tools it needs for something like that.