I bet if Trump changed his name, he'd win in a landslide. Because the republican voters would know about it, and the democrat voters largely vascillate between indifference and loathing when it comes to Biden - nobody really likes him so if they thought they weren't voting for Trump they'd go for it.
The three-card monty worked. At least it fooled someone.
You mean like reimbursing hush money payments and disguising them as legal invoices?
NDA agreements between parties are legal agreements plain and simple and she agreed to it. The whole purpose of NDA is not to disclose. This is not a crime, you'll have to do better than that.
I agree. But why cover it up?
What cover-up? The purpose of an NDA is silence. Being silent is not a cover-up. Seems that you are implying that if Trump did not advertise in the media the existence of the NDA that, that somehow constitutes a cover-up. An absurd proposition. If you want an example of a real cover-up, look at what Hillary did and Hunter's laptop. Seems they should have been the ones on trial, not Trump.
Oh, Sorry. I would have thought even Fox would have carried the story. My Bad.
That doesn't make sense because they said the entry shouldn't have been legal expenses. Not that you can't do an NDA. So again, no answers from the Dems. Why? Because they can't find a category more suitable than legal expenses!
A miscarriage of justice. Recall the attempt to use the 14th Amendment to remove Trump from the ballot. Ultimately, it was quashed by the Supreme Court. That is likely to happen with Trump's phony conviction. Also consider that this Trump persecution was initially rejected for prosecution by various prosecutors as it was considered too weak. Many legal experts consider this conviction to be a perversion of justice (lawfare),
Another absurd statement. By implication, this would mean that every every every every accounting entry that has a generic entry for a legal expense would be "illegal" under Bragg's approach unless it has an extensive narrative explaining each line item. An absurdity.
Guess Bragg proved them wrong.
OK, explain this to me. Trump DID NOT charge his campaign for the NDA. From the charge - he SHOULD have had his campaign pay. Although, that to me seems like it would be an illegal use of campaign funds.
Very true. He proved you can successfully prosecute a weak case if you have a Democrat jury, a Trump hating judge, let the prosecution go last and hide the crime until after the defense has rested.
