White Lives Don't Matter - apparently

The NBA kneels at the feet of China.
 
Why does the media pretend to be fearful of Russia Russia Russia, while turning a blind-eye to China? Hint below.

1596302937092.png
 
AccessBlaster said:
Why does the media pretend to be fearful of Russia Russia Russia, while turning a blind-eye to China? Hint below.

View attachment 83955
Click to expand...
Not only that, but it seems that the Democrats have merely resurrected their 2016 chants. Guess Biden's plagiarism is resurfacing. Then there is his "Build Back Better" rip-off of Trump's "Make America Great Again".
 
Tera said:
My question is why US went down to a point that should be fearful of either Russia or China?
Click to expand...
It's 100% Trumps fault and these issues never existed before 2016.

Edit:Tongue firmly in cheek...
 
Last edited:
AccessBlaster said:
It's 100% Trumps fault and these issues never existed before 2016.
Click to expand...
We had a news a while back that iPhone is down to third place after Huawei from China in first place and Samsung from Korea in second.
www.businessinsider.com

Apple just got knocked out of the top 3 smartphone makers in the world — here’s how it stacks up against rivals like Samsung, Huawei, and LG

Apple slipped to fourth place in a list of the world's top smartphone makers as of Q2 2019. Here's a look at the top 10.
www.businessinsider.com www.businessinsider.com

Now President Trump has announced he will ban TikTok to stop their growth, but I think it’s too late.
 
Unfortunately I got a shock back when I was in high school in rural Missouri back in the 70's. I overheard a couple students talk about a black family that was supposed to move into the area and they stated that they burned their house down before they could move in.
 
www.foxnews.com

Louisiana Supreme Court upholds Black man's life sentence for stealing hedge clippers more than 20 years ago

A sentence handed down to a Black man for stealing a pair of hedge clippers more than two decades ago was upheld by the Louisiana Supreme Court last week.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

Now that's a story that upsets me a bit. I know the guy had a record containing multiple instances of robbery, some serious, but I still think this is wrong.

We need to solve for this kind of thing. But take aaaaaaaaall the insistence on references to color out of the equation. We aren't changing it because we are "specially" concerned for any one color, we're changing it because it's unfair to any human being--equally unfair. That's a premise that's even more fundamental than the various ones for quibbling over race-'based' differences.........And one much more universally agreed-upon

If we could just unite over wrongs like "unfair things in crime & punishment", and leave race out of it, I think we'd get a lot farther - faster.
Until then some people will think the other side is picking EVERYTHING apart over perceived racial applications, and will thus dismiss the entire effort as prejudiced and unfair..., and still others actually WILL be tempted to do so - it's human nature to take advantages when they are seen and it's human nature to perceive offenses as often as possible. For all of us.

But that article is just wrong treatment of a human being. And yes, it's possible the Supreme Court upheld it because of their race vs. his race...But the SOLUTION to the problem I think (perhaps not intuitively), is to refuse to premise that solution on all kinds of possible racial motives.
 
That does seem unreasonable, and race certainly shouldn't be a factor. I suspect in the past judges were sometimes too lenient and that prompted "3 strikes" type laws that included mandatory sentencing. That took discretion out of the judge's hands. It was a case of the pendulum swinging too far. I assume the court upheld the sentence because it was the sentence required by their law. Good judges should have the discretion to make the punishment fit the crime, and that sentence didn't. If I'm the governor I'm commuting that one.
 
I know the guy was the victim of the Louisiana equivalent of the "three strikes you're out" laws. The laws were written during a time when you could get elected for "getting tough on crime." Personally, I think if any of the "three strikes" isn't a felony, it shouldn't count. But historically, this kind of law comes into effect after what is seen as a terrible crime spree. So the idea is to get the habitual offenders off the street for such a long time that when they finally get out, they are too tired and too worn out to commit another crime. Doesn't seem to work that well.
 
That now translates into approximately 60 years of active federal government programs aimed at helping the Black community. Based on the degree of acrimony currently being exhibited, it would appear that these programs have "failed".
Click to expand...
California is trying to repeal anti-discrimination laws so we can officially discriminate against white people. I think the rational, if you look deeply is that the left is convinced that our constitution guarantees equality of OUTCOME rather than opportunity. Any rational person knows that not all people are created equal so there will never be equal outcomes unless some higher authority takes from some people to give to others. Sadly, you still can't make a pig fly so all their efforts are doomed to fail which is why they concentrate on money rather than personal gifts. I would never make it in the NBA although I was a pretty decent player in high school. I remember going to a bridge tournament in Kansas City some years ago and KC was hosting the final four games that same week. It seems that every time I got into an elevator, I was looking at a belt buckle. Lordy, those boys were talllllllllllll.
 
That's an excellent point that I've tried to make with people before. We can't possibly guaranty equality of outcome, we can only try to achieve equality of opportunity.
 
It's about time that some responsible for civil rights recognize, that pushing an anti-white agenda is itself racist.
Civil rights official calls on Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan to halt Whites-only diversity training
“What is Seattle doing here? Playing Mad-Libs?” Mr. Kirsanow asked. “There is no way that separating white employees from other employees and telling them that this grab-bag of characteristics are inherent to white people and are bad (and therefore, that they have these characteristics and are bad) does not adversely affect their status in the eyes of their coworkers.”
...
“Under the banner of ‘antiracism,’ Seattle’s Office of Civil Rights is now explicitly endorsing principles of segregationism, group-based guilt, and race essentialism — ugly concepts that should have been left behind a century ago,” Mr. Rufo said in a July 29 post.
...
The curriculum also asks employees to answer questions such as, “How are you aware of the ways that your family benefits economically from the system of white supremacy even as it directly and violently harms Black people and non-Black people of color and Indigenous people?”
Click to expand...
We are living the world of "1984" twenty years "late". Orwell would be proud.
 
Rational people need to step up to the plate here. The left is trying to drive us back to the Jim Crow era. If we are so afraid of being called racists that we don't speak out, we are doomed as a society. With their cancel culture they have almost completely shut down dissent.
 
Last edited:
What is this Jim Crow thing people keep talking about?
 
So it was like apartheid in South Africa. I kept thinking Jim Crow was from the 60's but that must have been when it ended instead.
 
Critical Race Theory training needs to be abolished. Unfortunately, on several occasions, I was "forced" as a member of the entire staff to participate in "Diversity Training".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Steve R.
The Child Free Life
Replies
1
Views
174
Isaac
Isaac
Steve R.
Believe All Women
Replies
1
Views
84
Pat Hartman
P
Jon
Harvard and its Fake Diversity
2 3
Replies
59
Views
2,757
Isaac
Isaac
NauticalGent
My Facebook post on the election
Replies
7
Views
509
Pat Hartman
P
Uncle Gizmo
Writing Practice...
Replies
1
Views
279
conception_native_0123
conception_native_0123

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top Bottom